The price of silver soared in May, jumping more than 19% on safe haven demand as well as increased expectations of a swift economic recovery, given its many industrial applications. Not only was this silver’s best month since 2011, but it also marked an impressive turnaround for the white metal that just recently plunged to a more-than 10-year low. From March 18 through June 1 of this year, silver soared more than 52%, erasing all of its losses due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The question now is whether the rally can continue along with economic improvement, or whether it’s too late to start participating. I believe there’s still a lot of runway left, especially when you consider the growing need for silver in emerging technologies such as 5G wireless networks and photovoltaic (PV) cells, the building block of solar panels.
Silver started June in overbought territory based on the 14-day relative strength index (RSI), but that didn’t seem to deter investors. Global ETFs backed by physical silver have added some 142 million ounces since the metal dipped below $12 an ounce in mid-March. Holdings now stand at an incredible 746 million ounces, the most on record, according to Bloomberg data.
Interestingly, if you look at the chart below, silver ETF holdings appear to have begun tracking the price not of silver, but of gold.
This suggests to me that some investors are using the white metal as a more affordable safe haven and diversifier than gold. But there’s more to the story.
Like copper, nickel, lithium, cobalt and other metals, silver is set to become a major beneficiary of emerging industrial applications.
That includes sources of renewable energy, and solar specifically, which continues to ramp up around the globe in response to a combination of carbon emissions legislation and a rapid decrease in the cost of “green” electricity.
According to a recent report by CRU Consulting, solar power generation will increase to 1,053 terawatt hours (TWh) by 2025, close to double the amount that was generated in 2019. Amazon alone is planning five major solar projects around the world, including its first in China, as the retail giant seeks to reach 80 percent renewable energy by 2024 and 100 percent by 2030. Once completed, these five projects will generate 1.2 million megawatt hours (MWh) of energy every year, or enough to power 113,000 average U.S. homes, according to a press release.
I expect this to be a huge boon to silver, which is used to manufacture the all-important PV cells found in solar panels. Between now and 2030, PV manufacturers are projected to consume a staggering 888 million ounces of silver, according to CRU. To put that in perspective, that’s 51.5 million ounces more than the combined output from global silver mines in 2019.
But there are other technologies on the horizon that will require vast amounts of the white metal.
The global rollout of 5G technology, still in the very early stages, will increase production for goods such as semiconductor chips, cabling, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), Internet of things (IoT)-enabled devices—all of which require silver. In 2019, the amount of silver used in the applications stood at 7.5 million ounces, or 0.75 percent of annual output. By 2025, that amount could more than double to 16 million ounces and, by 2030, triple to 23 million ounces, according to estimates by Precious Metals Commodity Management.
Obviously there are other ways to get exposure to silver than buying physical bullion and silver-backed ETFs. Those include the silver miners themselves, if you can stomach the extra volatility.
Silver producers had a below-average first quarter compared to gold miners, with production plunging even before covid-19 led to the closure of mines. This had a negative effect on revenue.
Even so, a number of silver miners have performed very well, especially following the market lows in March. Among our favorites are SilverCrest Metals, up an incredible 105.8 percent over the past 12 months; Pan American Silver, up 142.3 percent; and First Majestic Silver, up 56.18%
(By Frank Holmes)
Comments