UK gov’t finds Glencore fell short of business guidelines in Chad
Case centres on a 2018 toxic spill at the Badila oilfield, equivalent in volume to 34 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
President Joe Biden is poised to suspend the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land, which accounts for about 10% of US supplies, according to four people familiar with the matter.
The moratorium, which would also freeze coal leasing, is set to be unveiled along with a raft of other climate policies next week, according to the people, who asked for anonymity to discuss plans not yet public.
The move would block the sale of new mining and drilling rights across some 700 million acres (2.8 million hectares) of federal land. It could also block offshore oil and gas leasing, though details are still being developed, some of the people said.
Spokesmen for the White House and Interior Department, which overseas leasing on federal land, declined to comment.
Oil and gas producers were the worst-performing group in the S&P 500 Index on Thursday. EOG Resources Inc. plunged 8.6%, its biggest one-day retreat since the end of November. Devon Energy Corp. slid 7.9% for its worst performance since September.
The companies had already fallen on a separate Interior Department order issued late Wednesday requiring the approval of top agency leaders to issue new drilling permits or oil and gas leases over the next 60 days.
That pause, which also applies to decisions on federal easements, environmental reviews, mining operations and hiring, provides time for new Biden officials to be confirmed and fill the agency’s ranks.
By contrast, the longer planned moratorium on new leases expected next week would let the administration assess their environmental impact and decide whether — and how — to restart selling them. The review could result in an end to leasing or to new limits on selling tracts and higher price tags to buy them.
Biden is also set to lay out plans for ensuring that 40% of the benefits of clean energy spending and policies flow to environmental justice communities
The moratorium would put the U.S. oil and gas industry squarely in the federal government’s crosshairs. Biden has called for phasing out fossil fuels over time in favor of cleaner power sources — an overhaul of the U.S. energy mix that would have profound implications for the economy, touching everything from pipelines to power lines.
The Biden administration is also developing plans to fulfill the president’s promise to target 40% of clean energy investments to disadvantaged communities, seize on climate change as a force for creating jobs, and stand up a government-wide task force dedicated to the issue. Final details are still being developed.
The steps will build on a blizzard of moves Biden took his first day in the White House, as he canceled the Keystone XL oil pipeline, rejoined the Paris climate accord, and directed regulators to review dozens of environmental rules imposed under former President Donald Trump.
People familiar with the planned actions say they reflect the Biden administration’s desire to rapidly implement strong climate policies, not merely clear out Trump-era rules. Biden promised to end new oil and gas permitting on federal land during his presidential campaign.
Oil industry leaders and politicians from the Western U.S. have warned the move could harm some local economies where drilling and mining flourishes — while crippling US energy production to the detriment of American consumers.
The Western Energy Alliance, which battled Obama-era rules targeting oil drilling, has vowed to immediately go to court to challenge any leasing ban. Kathleen Sgamma, who heads the group, said a ban on leasing and permitting amounts to “a death sentence” for the industry in the West, where exploration is “virtually impossible without touching some federal land or minerals, no matter how hard a company tries.”
Federal lands and waters together accounted for 22% of total U.S. oil production and 12% of US natural gas production in 2019, according to the Energy Information Administration. Onshore federal lands provide about 8% of the nation’s oil and 9% of its natural gas, according to the Bureau of Land Management. Data for 2020 are not yet available.
That makes that land a prime source of greenhouse gas emissions tied to burning those fossil fuels. The oil, gas and coal extracted on federal lands and waters is responsible for about 24% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, according to a US Geological Survey report.
Environmentalists have urged the Biden administration to enlist federal lands in the fight against climate change by transforming the territory into a sponge for carbon dioxide and uninterrupted habitat for vulnerable species. Conservationists — including Biden’s nominee to lead the Interior Department, Representative Deb Haaland — have embraced a plan to protect at least 30% of US land and ocean by 2030.
A moratorium can “give time for an actual review, letting the review and the science and the law dictate what the long-term form of leasing looks like,” said Collin O’Mara, president of the National Wildlife Federation.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday the administration still has a commitment to ending new oil and gas leasing on federal lands, without elaborating on the president’s plans. “We do, and the leases will be reviewed by our team,” Psaki said.
Biden already moved to block oil leasing and related activity in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge — where Congress in 2017 ordered the government to auction drilling rights twice by the end of 2024. In an executive order signed Wednesday, Biden directed the Interior Department to review his predecessor’s decision-making around Arctic oil development, including possibly redoing the Trump administration environmental analysis that provided the underpinning for its Jan. 6 sale of nine leases.
The new, broader approach covering all federal lands is modeled after a strategy employed by former President Barack Obama in 2016, when he ordered a moratorium on new sales of mining rights and used the time-out to examine whether the federal coal leasing program should be modernized. The program was swiftly restarted under Trump before that assessment concluded.
Environmental and natural resources lawyers say the approach may be more legally durable if buttressed by such a programmatic environmental review. Both federal law and Bureau of Land Management plans governing land under the agency’s control mandate regular lease sales.
Oil industry advocates argue that drilling blockades do nothing to stifle emissions — just shift that crude production elsewhere. “The world is still going to need natural gas and oil under any scenario for a long time,” said Dan Naatz, senior vice president with the Independent Petroleum Association of America. “A leasing ban is just going to ship that production to Saudi Arabia, to Russia, where there are far less stringent environmental controls.”
Industry leaders have been warning about potential economic pain to Western states whose budgets depend on revenue from oil and gas produced on federal land.
“Blocking American companies from accessing our country’s natural resources is bad for American jobs, bad for state budgets, and bad for national security” said Anne Bradbury, chief executive of the American Exploration and Production Council.
Biden is also set to lay out plans for ensuring that 40% of the benefits of clean energy spending and policies flow to environmental justice communities — areas that are on the front lines of climate change or have historically weathered the brunt of pollution. During the campaign, the president committed to target 40% of his clean energy investments — including spending on sustainable housing and mass transit — to disadvantaged communities.
Biden’s forthcoming directive also is set to establish an external advisory board that will focus on updating Clinton-era environmental justice policies aimed at addressing the disproportionate effects pollution imposes on poor people and communities of color.
(By Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Ari Natter, with assistance from Stephen Cunningham)
Comments