The mining industry can’t give guarantees just as airlines can’t.
Over the years we have seen several airplane crashes due to mechanical error that have resulted in many unfortunate deaths and injuries.
Prior to those accidents all of those passengers and all of their extended families knew that once those people boarded those planes that there was a slight chance of an air disaster but because flight travel is considered
a necessity, all concerned accepted the chance they were taking.
Similar to the exhaustive engineering that goes into building airplanes to make them as safe as humanly possible, a great deal of engineering goes into designing mines to make them as safe as possible to prevent accidents that may harm people and the environment.
The mining engineering that goes into designing mines is supposed to make them as resistant as possible to accidents that may cost lives or destroy wildlife. But things don’t always go as planned.
Just days ago, a Canadian mining company, Imperial Metals Corp. (III-T), announced that their tailings pond wall had been breached in one area at their Mount Polley copper-gold mine in central British Columbia,
Canada.
In less than 24 hours after the breach, horrific damage had been caused by the tailings (leftover rock that was mined that had very little copper or gold) and water that burst into a nearby river. Fortunately the water has been continuously treated during the life of the mining operation and so is not acidic. As such, it should not be hazardous to people’s health. As it has been routinely analyzed for various metals content.
This event is somewhat analogous to a antural mudslide. Afterwards, the debris is cleaned up and people somehow get back on with their lives. In those mudslides debris has been moved sometimes settling into nearby streams, rivers and lakes. “The material released from a tailings dam is similar in composition to the material in a natural mudslide. The results of both are disastrous in the short term, but are non-toxic and recover naturally in the long term.”
By all accounts, as the media has thoroughly repeated, this type of an accident should not have happened. But we all know it doesn’t work that way. The fact is that accidents, while rare, are always going to happen. All we can do is try to learn from the mistakes and improve safety for future projects.
At this early stage after the accident, it appears the tailings pond was getting too full and that the company was in the process of having some of the extra treated water discharged, but that approval had not
yet come. This would be a touchy application and no doubt the local native aboriginals and various environmental groups would have wanted to have significant input into that decision, creating a delay which may have also partially contributed to this disaster.
Much effort will likely be put into vacuuming up the easiest-to-get tailings pond material, then pumping it back into the repaired tailings pond. The remainder of the spilt material in the nearby river and the downstream lake will likely be allowed to remain. Science has shown that the best place to put mine tailings is under water, though this typically creates a knee-jerk negative reaction from most people.
If the mine tailings material has been treated as it should have been, there should be very little copper left in the spilt material and the only other mineral that might be of concern is prrite, an iron sulphide. The good news is that in this particular type of copper deposit, there is usually very little pyrite.
Nearby residents are seeing disruptions to their water supply, but that problem will be resolved. This area of British Columbia has abundant water supplies, and I am confident that somewhere down the road the people with homes and cabins on the lakeshore now affected will be able to once again use that nearby lake water
if governmental regulatory agencies deem it safe for consumption.
Back in 1998, another mining company, Boliden Limited, experienced a similar disaster at their Los Frailes copper mine in Spain. Just like at Imperial Metal’s mine, the tailings dam breached, creating a massive
spill out of their tailings pond of around the same scale. It took several years and cost nearly $300 million to clean up.
But will Mt Polley mine close? Probably not.
This mine provided a lot of very high paying jobs, providing an excellent tax base to the local and provincial governments to support schools, hockey arenas (a ‘must’ in Canada) and curling clubs. The logging industry in this area was decimated by the pine beetle kill, so these mining jobs and tax revenues are dearly needed.
While the company works to clean up the disaster area, the engineers will be going to work to figure out what went wrong in order to prevent this from happening again.
It’s likely that accidents like this will happen again. Despite the risk, the mining industry will continue, because people need metals like copper in order to enjoy access to electricity for their homes and offices, to
computers, cars, air conditioners, and other modern comforts. Even without disasters like Imperial Metals, it is already getting harder and harder to find new deposits of copper and other metals to feed development, as most of the near to surface and easy to get at deposits have been found and mined.
We are already seeing the expected outcry that mining companies shouldn’t be allowed to mine near where people live, or near wildlife or fish habitats, unless they can guarantee that this kind of accident will never happen again. But you have to recognize that we need to balance the risk of damage to the environment against the risk of a shortage of materials needed to sustain modern civilization.
I pray another mine disaster like this one never occurs again but I am also confident that we will learn and improve from the mistakes at Mount Polley. For instance, a fairly new technique called dry stacking of tailings material might be the best way to prevent these sorts of disasters in the future. There is no doubt that the unfortunate event that just occurred at the Mount Polley Mine will affect – and likely delay, other companies such as Pretium Resources Corp. and KGHM International that are currently nearing submission of their mine building permits in British Columbia.
Steve Todoruk worked as a field geologist for major and junior mining exploration companies after he graduated with a B. Sc. in Geology from the University of British Columbia, in 1985. Steve joined Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. in 2003 as a Senior Investment Executive. To contact Steve, e-mail him at [email protected] or call him at 1.800.477.7853.
12 Comments
rainbowlamm4
I cannot believe you would try to say that environmentalists and local indigenous groups may have created a delay; way to try to divert the blame. I would bet money that what happened is what usually happens when a disaster like this occurs…the mining company was trying to save money by doing as little as possible to not pollute. After all, profit is the name of the game and too bad to those that have to live with the aftermath. Same ‘ol, same’ol. Shame on you Mr. Todoruk
Chip
There were multiple warnings that the tailings ponds were overfilling their designed capacitity. The tailings incorporate toxic heavy metals including arsenic, lead and other hazardous materials. Not ‘ just iron sulfites ‘ as you state. That is why they are isolated from the rest of the environment. You sound like you could bottle them and put them on grocery shelves. You are being, as expected, very misleading to the public. The truth will come out whether you like it or not.
Horrified
I heard that Canada is headed by a conservative PM who goes out of his way to muzzle anyone who truly cares about the environment – you must be his favorite mouthpiece.
Outback
Mr Todoruk; it sounds as though you are out of your league and should not relfect on things with which you are unfamiliar. I will echo the previous comments, and illuminate that there is nothing natural about a tailings dam breach. What we have here is Imperial Metals storing way too much supernatant water in the Mount Polly TSF, disregarding the recommendations of technical experts and industry standards. As a result, they have destroyed a large part of their surrounding environment, truncated the source of income for their employees, and tarnished the reputation of the industry nationally and internationally. This is an event that could have been avoided, but Imperial decided to take a major risk in an effort to reduce operating costs. The company should be heavily penalised, and management should be held personally responsible.
GeologyBear
Although I would agree that the media is ‘sensationalizing’ several aspects of this story, I feel that this article is just trying to shift the blame onto environmental / First Nations bands. Engineers do get it wrong: planes will unfortunately fall from the sky and dams will breach. But if the engineer is given one set of conditions and the company pushes those limits, bad things happen. That is why you cannot inflate your bicycle tires with a gas station air pump. I am in the mining industry and have found time and time again in the past few years that greed and deliberate ignorance trumps all, whether at a senior management level or those who benefit the most to gain. We have to remember that while metals are in demand, we are often operating as guests in an area; we need to get back to remembering that social and environmental responsibilities outweigh profit margins and investor returns. This article was just yet another knee-jerk article that has been vomited out over the past few days. I would also suggest that you spell check before posting … there are several errors that just make me think again that this is a ‘rush job’.
techie
Really comparing a land based dam to an airplane with all it’s components! The author is either a fool or a mouthpiece. Engineering of a dam to required specs is not difficult, using one in a manner that exceeds spec’s is not difficult. Resisting corporate goals and forecasts is difficult and standing up to management is tremendously so if you have a family to care for. The loser’s are the people who’s watershed is now probably devoid of life. the water may return to drinkable in a short period but the loss of fauna and aquatic flora may take over a generation. This brings back memories of Placer Domes Indonesian dam breach.
An article totally lacking in compassion for wildlife, and the residents, but all about protecting the portfolio of Sprott
Guest
The only risk will either to be to the environment or a shortage of minerals? This is the problem. Where is the risk to the owners and operators? Mining corporations have no skin in the game. They are protected from liability by corporate structure and insurance. There will be no criminal charges and no one will go to jail. I say throw out all the permits and requirements. Make the mine owners and contractors build their house and raise their families under the structures they are responsible for. This is how the Romans did it and many of their structures stand to this day.
Rob
Accidents do not just happen!
They are caused.
You cannot just brush it off with a “accidents will always happen” strategy and philosophy.
Unbelievable!
Name
The entire base for this article is wrong.
The mine had ample warnings from engineers experts and Government inspectors as it has been widely documented.
Management is responsible for this mess and they shoudl be made to pay.
The Government response or therefore lack-off, to its own inspector’s report is a symptom of the mining industry, where safety is over-ruled in name of economic development(AKA few people making big bucks)
clearsky
Pretty shameful apologia of a disaster. Shameful that Mining.com would let someone lie so shamelessly. Here, Mr Todoruk is the list of just the 2013 in-situ toxic release (source below)
Mount Polley mine on-site disposal in 2013:
Arsenic (and its compounds): 406 tonnes
Lead (and its compounds) 177 tonnes
Nickel (and its compounds) 326 tonnes
Vanadium (except when in an alloy): 5,047 tonnes
Zinc (and its compounds): 2,169 tonnes
Cadmium (and its compounds): 6 tonnes
Cobalt (and its compounds): 475 tonnes
Phosphorus (total): 41,640 tonnes
Copper (and its compounds): 18,413 tonnes
Antimony (and its compounds) 14 tonnes
Manganese (and its compounds): 20,988 tonnes
Mercury (and its compounds): 3 tonnes
Selenium (and its compounds): 46 tonnes
Source: NPRI
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/mount-polley-mine-tailings-water-very-close-to-drinking-quality-company-says-1.2727776 know about the very long list of heavy metals in that sludge
tgbc
My friend is a farmer he had plywood in chimney creek to flood a small meadow.he did this for forty years. The ministry of environment visited him and he showed them the plywood dam which in no way hindered fish.they took the farmer to court and fined him ten thousand dollars.
If my farmer friend can get fined for not hurting the environment what should this company get for its negligence.
Haley
I work at polley. in their warehouse and my dad has worked here since he was 18…my age. He now works at Red Chris a new mine up north where aboriginal people have set up a blockade…my dad couldn’t even come home for the weekend. it is NOT the engineers fault. NOT the workers fault! they were only doing as they were told and shouldn’t have to suffer so. this article is completely accurate when they say accidents happened. just like an airline. I was on shift when the breach happened it was 1:00am there was next to nobody out near the dam as is the usual of a night shift, it was an extremely unfortunate accident and I am deeply saddened by the amount of damage done to the environment….but its true the water was NOT toxic and will not cause extensive damage.
yes there were sayings that the tailings was getting a little high. but EXACTLY as the article says we were in the process of trying to get approval to expand, we were doing everything we could to speed it along but as so many groups want input it takes a long time. A lot of people have lost their jobs due to this breach. what about them? this is a tragedy for us as much as it is for the public but you don’t see the people who got layed off complaining and bad mouthing this place.
I am…hurt. greatly by the amount of slander that is being layered on mount polley…everyone automatically believes the media without question but they are no experts. and the “experts” who have been doing interviews for the media? some of them haven’t worked here in a long time. I wish that people would ask the small guys. like me. or the people who actually worked at the dam….we wont lie just to save the company. I have no great love of this place…but some of the people I have grown to care about and they don’t need their name blackened due to something that we couldn’t prevent.
when this article compares mining to flying it is pretty accurate. accidents happen. the only difference between a plane crash and a tailings breach I that NO ONE DIES IN A TAILINGS BREACH. and you’re saying a breach is worse? a breach that is being repaired as I type this? that will not cause extensive damage? maybe you should be asking the right people the right questions before you go having an opinion you know nothing about.
I cannot say how saddened I am by the publics ignorance….I hope that some of you at least give this article serious thought.