No Fed rate hike good for gold, bad sign for economy

Joe McAlinden, founder of McAlinden Research Partners and former chief global strategist with Morgan Stanley Investment Management, was disappointed that the Fed “blinked.” He called the decision irresponsible and attributed it to worries about China’s growth. The veteran investor saw the status quo as bullish for precious metals and oil, but warned, “As the Fed continues to postpone moving towards normalization of interest rates, the potential for future inflation from years of excessive stimulation increases with every delay of the end of the zero interest rate policy.”

He continued, “Based on today’s decision, we now need to watch economic data from China and the performance of the markets themselves. I do not believe that the Fed’s focus on those points is appropriate. Nonetheless, it is now clear that these will influence the timing of the next Fed move. Also, and more appropriately, we should be watching average hourly earnings, overall signs of strength or weakness in the U.S. economy, and the trend of the core PCE deflator.”

Frank Holmes, CEO and chief investment officer at U.S. Global Investors, called the decision combined with recent negative global Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) (51.10 for August compared to 52.7 in July) “a wash” for precious metals, oil and gas prices, as an increase would have increased the strength of the dollar compared with other currencies and accelerated an economic slowdown. He saw the inevitable decision coming, however, and used it as an opportunity to buy 2-year bonds in the lead up to the meeting.

“Shortly after the announcement, bond yields began to fall and prices went up. From the Precious Metals Summit in Beaver Creek where he was speaking about global trends, he blamed China’s blue skies, a smog clearing brought on by a lack of manufacturing output. “I anticipate a resurgence of exports as the renminbi becomes more competitive with the dollar,” he said. He will be watching the October and November PMI numbers for an increase in economic activity, which will be positive indicators for the love trade—gold as gifts and jewelry in China and India—and growth commodities—copper, oil and gas.

ShadowStats’ Publisher John Williams was expecting the Fed to raise interest rates, as he said in an interview with The Gold Report the first week of September, “to begin restoring some sense of normalcy in the monetary system.” The decision not to make even a token move up could be cause for concern, he warned.

“Market concerns should shift now to looking at what circumstances really are scaring the Fed. The dynamics of intensifying shifts in global perceptions of U.S. economic activity and U.S. systemic stability rapidly should gain dominance over Fed policy in driving the U.S. currency and equity markets, irrespective of future Fed actions or lack of same,” he said in a note to subscribers moments after the announcement.

When asked for his reaction, John Mauldin, the man behind Mauldin Economics and author of “Bull’s Eye Investing: Targeting Real Returns in a Smoke and Mirrors Market,” quoted Peter Boockvar, managing director of The Lindsey Group, who lamented that because the Fed had punted again, we are all in for another six weeks of obsessing over when it will happen.

“The Fed is implicitly acknowledging that its policy action over the past five years of putting the U.S. economy on a sustainable growth path has been a failure and now if their international concerns become more pronounced, they will also admit to the world that they have no tools to deal with it. I think today’s decision was a bad one. The dollar rally should be over and I’m bullish on precious metals (again), as I don’t understand at all what the bear case is in it anymore. Other commodities should benefit too from the weak dollar. Be cautious, the Fed did more damage to its credibility today.”

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/no-fed-rate-hike-good-for-gold-bad-sign-for-economy

DISCLOSURE:
1) JT Long conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report and The Life Sciences Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee.
2) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
3) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110
Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999
Fax: (707) 981-8998
Email: [email protected]