Geordie Mark focuses on miners making money at $1,200/oz gold

Geordie Mark: Yes. Our 2015 outlook is $1,250/oz, and thereafter we project a flat outlook to manifest a more agnostic view on the commodity. We employ this approach as it facilitates greater correlation between cash flow expectations and our view of operational performance.

TGR: What are the factors keeping gold at $1,200/oz?

GM: We see gold demand support predominantly arising from Asia, particularly in India and China, but also note recent rhetoric from Russia outlining the potential of increasing the country’s metal inventory.

TGR: When we spoke last year, you said you anticipated a gold-silver price ratio of 60. Today, the ratio is 70. What’s your forecast for the price of silver for the second half of 2015, and what’s your forecast for the ratio?

GM: Our silver forecast is $18/oz, which translates to a ratio of about 70. Silver’s supply/demand fundamentals are somewhat different than gold’s, as much silver is derived as a byproduct from base metal production. Even so, we are seeing ever-increasing supplies of silver moving into various investor-oriented vehicles. For example we have seen the silver balances within exchange-traded funds (ETFs) hold more support compared to gold ETFs in recent years. The evolving supply-demand picture for silver shows that this metal is becoming more and more like gold in that its demand is increasingly reliant on investor participation.

TGR: Is gold production sustainable at $1,200/oz, and, if so, for how long?

GM: Gold production costs have come down over the last couple of years, due to mine optimization, lower staffing levels, cheaper energy and the strength of the U.S. dollar across a basket of currencies. Global gold production appears to have actually increased relatively steadily since 2008, albeit in a more recent pricing environment where the metal price has exhibited notable headwinds. Gold at around $1,200/oz should result in sustainable production for some time, particularly in operations outside the U.S., such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand, but ultimately the sector needs additional discoveries to replace the currently depleting reserves base.

TGR: You mentioned mine optimization. To what extent are gold producers now skimming off the top: rearranging their mine plans to get at the easiest part of their ore and the ore that is of the highest grade?

GM: Ultimately, mine-plan optimization is a dynamic process. The first notable change happened in 2013, but there remains a steady evolution in the cost structure of individual operations and the mechanisms (e.g., mining plan modifications, cut-off grade variations and staffing profiles) in which they moderate overall costs. Thankfully, and in addition to the aforementioned, many input costs (e.g., fuel, reagents and steel) have winnowed more recently to foster operating margin protection and/or expansion.

TGR: To what extent are gold producers benefiting from the collapse of the price of oil?

GM: We’ve witnessed some significant changes in cost structure from many producers as recorded in Q1/15. They certainly have been saving significantly on the operational cost side as oil slid into the $60 per barrel range. This precipitous drop in oil prices helped those producers with a significant mining fleet, as well as those sourcing power via on-site fuel generated power. In conjunction with the recent stability in the gold price, this pricing drop has allowed for the protection of operating margins.

TGR: For how long can gold producers expect to benefit from low oil prices and a strong U.S. dollar?

GM: We view these as short-term phenomena, but do not project a specific date or catalyst to change the status quo. Our team sees oil prices moving higher over time, certainly in the mid-term. As for the U.S. dollar, we project the currency holding its strength against the basket of other currencies over the near term. That is good news for resource companies with operations in the European Union, Asia, Australasia, South America and those countries linked to the South African rand, like Namibia.

TGR: Of the companies you follow, which are your favorite gold producers?

GM: If you’re looking for free cash-flow generation and producing yield with some growth, we like Tahoe Resources Inc. (TAHO:NYSE; THO:TSX) for exposure to silver and gold in the Americas.

If you’re looking at Asia and Australasia, we like OceanaGold Corp. (OGC:TSX; OGC:ASX). This company boasts modest growth in the near term and delivers solid operating margins while also offering modest dividend yield.

If you’re looking for significant growth and a gold producer looking to put another operation into production over the nearer term, we like B2Gold Corp. (BTG:NYSE; BTO:TSX; B2G:NSX). It has operations in the Philippines, Nicaragua and Namibia and has begun infrastructure development at a fifth potential mine, Fekola in Mali.

These companies have all witnessed recent operating cost reduction arising because of lower energy costs and weaker local currencies.

TGR: Earlier this year, Tahoe bought Rio Alto Mining. How does the new Tahoe differ from the old company?

GM: The takeover of Rio Alto and its Peruvian assets, the La Arena gold mine and the Shahuindo gold project, have bolstered Tahoe’s production profile and its technical expertise profile and given it jurisdictional diversification. The company is now producing a significant amount of gold—220,000 oz (220 Koz) from La Arena last year—to add to the silver it produces from Escobal in Guatemala. It has come close to doubling silver-equivalent production as a result of the merger. It now has significant free cash flow that it can put to work to developing Shahuindo, which is scheduled to begin production in early 2016. Bringing Shahuindo on-stream is expected to aid cash flow generation that ultimately could be used to fund further acquisitions.

TGR: What’s your opinion of Shahuindo’s prospects?

GM: It looks to be a low-cost build, with a modest capital expenditure (capex) for an initial Run of Mine heap leach operation that would likely move to a larger scale multi-stage crush, heap leach mine. Senior management from both Tahoe and Rio Alto has heap-leach experience, and with La Arena relatively proximal to Shahuindo, they have significant operational experience within Peru. These synergies certainly boost Shahuindo’s performance and growth potential.

TGR: B2Gold is another company with jurisdictional diversification, with mines in Nicaragua, the Philippines and now, Otjikoto in Namibia. Having visited Otjikoto, how do you rate its ramp up?

GM: Otjikoto began commercial production last quarter, following a first pour in December 2014. This project was basically on time and on budget. That’s rare for mining projects. We see Otjikoto as being the platform for the company’s production expansion within Africa, and reportedly appears to be operating ahead of budget year to date. Next up is Fekola in Mali. Team members that built Otjikoto are in Mali now, developing the project’s infrastructure, and further team members are expected to migrate to Mali over time as the Otjikoto expansion is completed next quarter. The Fekola feasibility study was just delivered, and we believe that B2Gold’s board will likely make a formal development decision soon given its anticipated low opex and life expansion potential beyond the currently outlined 12.5 years.

TGR: On May 20, B2Gold announced it had secured a $350 million ($350M) credit facility. What do you make of this?

GM: It resolves a perceived overhang. The market had believed that the company would be forced to tap the equity market to fund its development and expansion plans. We see the $350M facility negating the need for the company to issue shares to fund growth in the near term. The new facility, which is now closed and the first $150M draw, is expected to be used primarily to fund work at Otjikoto, such as the development of an underground mine at the Wolfshag zone, as well as the development of Fekola. The revolver facility also has the capacity to be expanded to $450M, which gives further support to the company’s argument for not needing to draw on the equity markets. In our view, if commodity prices remain stable, we believe that B2Gold can fund its development projects with its new revolver facility and cash flow from its existing portfolio of assets.

TGR: Moving on to OceanaGold, how is this company evolving?

GM: It has three producing mines, one of which, Reefton in New Zealand, will close this year. Oceana has shifted its focus to the Philippines with the commissioning of Didipio, which will produce 100 Koz gold and 14,000 tons copper annually at significant margins.

New Zealand remains important to Oceana, however. In June, the company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Waihi gold mine and surrounding exploration ground from Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM:NYSE) for $101M plus other considerations. We consider this as a positive step, as it adds critical mass to its New Zealand operations. Waihi has potentially three or more years of production and that could expand even further depending on its success in exploration at Correnso and elsewhere. This is a prudent, small-scale acquisition that adds to Oceana’s existing operational base. One of the worries that people had about Oceana was that it would acquire an asset that was inconsistent with the current market environment and the team’s current production philosophy. Instead, Oceana made a synergistic acquisition that was aligned with the team’s focus of delivering margin, and which has demonstrable exploration upside that could be integrated into future production.

TGR: Oceana now owns 14.9% of Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (GSV:TSX.V; GSV:NYSE). What is the reason for this investment?

GM: Oceana wanted to consolidate its presence in the Americas, and in particular within one of North America’s primary gold-producing states, Nevada. To that end, Gold Standard Ventures has a significant footprint in that state, and defined some very intriguing systems at the Railroad-Pinion gold project in the Carlin Trend. Oceana’s technical team likes the potential of the holdings that Gold Standard has put together in that state over the last several years.

TGR: Newmont and Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE) have been ridding themselves of a fair number of properties recently. Will this trend continue?

GM: Yes. Across the mining space, the larger companies have been divesting smaller-scale assets and assets with lower-defined mine lives in order to deleverage, and harmonize operational management. The smaller companies that buy these assets have the potential to improve the operating cost structure at these assets, refocus the local workforce and test for future reserve potential.

TGR: How big do Tahoe, OceanaGold and B2Gold want to become?

GM: That’s a good question for their respective management teams. These companies have been buying assets that marry well with the practical capacity of their operating teams. I believe that the reasonable plan for these companies is to grow at a modest pace that is commensurate with their capacity. There is a dearth of mid-tier gold producing companies, and so that’s probably a reasonable space to grow into whether by organic growth, acquisition or a combination of both.

TGR: Has your rating of any of these companies changed recently?

GM: After Tahoe’s purchase of Rio Alto and its Q1/15 performance was announced, our rating changed from Hold to Buy. We like the team and its near-term focus to support production growth and bolster operating margin. Tahoe has a world-class asset in Escobal that provides a cornerstone free cash flow generator that will enable management to consider pragmatic and timely future acquisitions.

TGR: What are your two favorite African gold development projects?

GM: One that is at the front of the list is Asanko Gold Inc.’s (AKG:NYSE.MKT; AKG:TSX) Asanko gold mine in Ghana. We visited it last month. It’s likely more than 50% complete now and on schedule for its first pour in February 2016. Phase 1 is on track to meet its capex of $295M. That said, we expect that Asanko is supported by a $40M liquidity buffer (cash and debt) beyond the project contingency within the $295M capex figure. We like the jurisdiction, and the onsite development team has considerable experience in building mines across Africa.

With phase 2, Asanko has the capacity go from about 200 Koz annually to 400 Koz starting in 2018–2019. Altogether, Asanko has more than 4 million ounces (4 Moz) in reserves and more than 10 Moz in resources across its Asanko gold mine asset portfolio. We believe that the company trades relatively cheaply compared to its underlying net asset value, and our target price projects the company’s market price to move toward the net asset value per share as the mine moves closer to production.

TGR: So you were impressed by the economics of the phase 2 expansion announced May 14?

GM: Certainly. Asanko looks to utilize the synergies inherent in the project given the proximity and characteristics of the deposits to be exploited in a phase 2 operation, as well as the infrastructure already being built for phase 1 (e.g., processing plant footprint, tailings dam). These synergies greatly improve on the economics of phase 2 rather than it being a standalone operation. We are looking forward to the full feasibility report due next year, so we can review other potential the company has been able to squeeze out through further optimization.

TGR: What other near-term gold project do you follow in Africa?

GM: Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE:TSX) and its Bomboré project in Burkina Faso. This company has a very experienced management team that discovered and put into development the Essakane mine that was sold to IAMGOLD Corp. (IMG:TSX; IAG:NYSE).

The Bomboré feasibility study was released in April. The feasibility outlined a capex of $250M and an after-tax internal rate of return of 24.4%. Bomboré is a low-grade deposit, but it contains more than 5 Moz gold, of which the aforementioned project only touches the surface in exploiting a portion of the oxide material and leaving the underlying larger sulphide resources. The company has developed an elegant processing approach that would employ integrated heap-leach and carbon-in-leach (CIL) processing where scrubbing of the ore material would result in the fines material (containing ~50% of the gold) going to the CIL plant, whereas coarse-grained tails report to the heap leach pad for processing. This processing plant is expected to lower the risk to gold recovery, and significantly reduce average recovery times versus employing a simple heap leach processing model only.

Operating costs on a per-ton basis are expected to be relatively low given the aforementioned processing plan and a low mining strip ratio of just over one. I think there’s potential for additional resource growth within the oxide profile, which could add to mine life. All together the Bomboré presents as quite a decent project.

TGR: How stable a jurisdiction is Burkina Faso?

GM: It is in a state of political flux at the moment. It doesn’t have an elected government, but it is looking at an election in Q4/15. Despite the uncertainty, a number of companies have recently gone into construction. Roxgold Inc. (ROG:TSX.V) was the most recent operator given a decree for mining, and True Gold Mining Inc. (TGM:TSX.V) has just announced that it is back in construction mode. Orezone submitted a mine permit application for Bomboré in May, and this could be approved before the election. That would be very positive for Orezone management.

TGR: What are signs investors should be looking for to indicate an upward shift in market sentiment?

GM: Fundamentally gold price is a significant determinant on sector sentiment, so we look for development of pricing stability to improve sector sentiment on the equity side. In addition, success breeds success, where pricing support is also expected to be aided by the improvement in operational performance from the producers, as well as continued consolidation in the sector. Together these factors could foster renewed interest in the sector.

TGR: Geordie, thank you for your time and your insights.

Geordie Mark is the co-head of mining research at Haywood Securities. Prior to this, he was an analyst with Passport Capital and was vice president of exploration for Cash Minerals. Before joining the exploration industry full-time, he lectured in economic geology at Monash University, Australia, and served as an industry consultant. He holds a Ph.D. in geology from James Cook University.

 Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Interviews page.

Source: Kevin Michael Grace of The Gold Report 

DISCLOSURE:
1) Kevin Michael Grace conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher ofThe Gold Report, The Energy Report and The Life Sciences Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an independent contractor. He owns, or his family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Tahoe Resources Inc., Gold Standard Ventures Corp. and Asanko Gold Inc. The companies mentioned in this interview were not involved in any aspect of the interview preparation or post-interview editing so the expert could speak independently about the sector. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services.
3) Geordie Mark: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: Asanko Gold Inc., Gold Standard Ventures Corp. and Roxgold Inc. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I determined and had final say over which companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2014 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.