Advances in automotive battery technology are making graphite the next big thing for commodity investors. Graphite is the critical material for the new generation of batteries, even more than lithium or rare earths. In this special interview with The Mining Report, Focus Graphite President and Chief Operating Officer Don Baxter explains the eyebrow-raising supply/demand picture of the graphite industry, the attractive financials of the Lac Knife project and the significance of the graphite industry’s first offtake agreement, including what it means to investors looking to understand an unfamiliar but well-positioned market.
MANAGEMENT Q&A: VIEW FROM THE TOP
The Mining Report: The recent news from Tesla Motors about its plans to build the largest battery factory in the world has generated a lot of investor excitement. Can you give us your perspective on the role of automotive battery technology as the driver of global graphite demand?
Don Baxter: As a starting point, the graphite industry today is about a half million tons per year of natural flake graphite. It is used in everyday products across many industries including steel, automotive and technology. Graphite touches our lives every day. Graphite is in the brake pads in our cars and has many other common applications. But that is not where the excitement in the graphite industry comes from.
The big interest in graphite comes from the growth in lithium-ion battery technology. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles are increasing every quarter and companies like Tesla are spending heavily on battery technology. Graphite is one of the key materials needed to build a lithium-ion battery. In fact, a lithium-ion battery contains 10 times more graphite than lithium. The most critical material for a high performance lithium-ion battery is graphite, not lithium.
With the accelerating growth of electric and hybrid vehicles, the additional graphite demand from the automotive battery sector could exceed a million tons a year by 2020. That is not including the half million tons that are already used. The world is going to need a lot more graphite. China controls close to 80% of the world’s supply right now. That makes battery makers very uncomfortable.
TMR: A tripling of current graphite consumption in less than six years?
DB: Yes. The traditional uses for graphite in the steel and automotive industries will continue because there aren’t a lot of substitutes in those applications. In the entire battery segment, we are seeing more and more lithium-ion batteries taking over the market space. Lithium-ion batteries are now the battery of choice in most consumer goods, from laptops to cell phones to power tools and more. Not only are the number of applications growing, but also the size of each battery is getting bigger. Inside a lithium-ion battery, the battery component that is made from graphite is the anode. Anodes can be either synthetic or natural graphite, but synthetic is extremely expensive at approximately $20,000/ton ($20/Kt), compared to battery-grade, natural flake graphite at approximately $8/Kt. Not only does natural flake graphite have a cost advantage, there are several performance characteristics that are better for natural than they are for synthetic.
TMR: What grades or types of graphite are used in the battery sector?
DB: A producer will make a run-of-mine (ROM) product, which is all the different graphite flake sizes at various carbon grades. In the case of our Lac Knife property in Quebec, all of our products (large, medium and fine flake graphite) are 98% carbon. That is a very pure concentrate for ROM production, especially with the fine flake size.
In our case, we’ll be able to take our lower valued product, the ROM fine flake, and enhance it by sizing, shaping and purifying. In technical terms, we will micronize and spherize the fine flake graphite to create a battery-grade product with a much higher value than the ROM fine flake. In that case, we will have taken a product that we normally would have sold for $900/ton and turned it into a product worth $8/Kt. Even with an increased all-in cost for that value-added processing of between $1,500 and $2,000/ton, it is a significant margin increase.
TMR: Is the processing of the material at Lac Knife different than at other mines?
DB: Graphite from varied locales behaves differently during processing. The key thing with Lac Knife is that we can divert our fine size material, which is extremely high purity carbon at 98%. That means our purifying step is only from 98% to 99.95%. Other mines typically have much lower carbon grades, say 90% or less. Lower grades make the initial purification step much more difficult. Producers may be able to physically size and shape the graphite, but the purification is the challenge, if it’s possible at all. Lac Knife is unique in that we can divert our high-grade fines to battery applications.
TMR: Are the upgrading to battery grade and the associated much higher revenue products included in the initial financial models on your website?
DB: No. All of our current financials are based on run-of-mine product, which is the market that is here today. The Industrial Minerals publication out of the U.K. publishes prices for different sizes and grades of graphite flake and we base our economics on those figures. The analysis shows that the Lac Knife deposit is profitable at today’s market prices. That said, we think that we are at the bottom of this price cycle, so we’re basing our economics on current market prices.
Based on today’s prices, our economics show great potential, even with what appear to be low market prices. Additional upside will come from value-added processing, which we are advancing in parallel. Once we have the capital expenses (capex) and operating expenses for the value-added processes, we can then add that into our overall economics. There is a tremendous upside based on the high margin of the value-added processing, but it will be a gradual process to get that part of the business up and running because it is dependent on the initial ROM production.
If everything works out, we would start off with several thousand tons a year going through the process of making battery-grade graphite. Over time and with expansion, we could increase our ability to produce battery grade and spherical graphite as the market demands it. Ultimately, could we put all of our flake into it? Maybe, but for starters, we are basing our project build on conventional mining, which in the case of Lac Knife is a high margin project. Additional margin from value-added processing is a long-term option.
TMR: So are you saying that the prefeasibility study does not and the full feasibility study will not reflect any additional revenue or expense from the potential production of spherical or battery-grade graphite by Focus Graphite Inc. (FMS:TSX.V; FCSMF:OTCQX; FKC:FSE)?
DB: Correct. While we are working in parallel with the design of our value-added processing and our ROM processing, the former is not likely to be ready at the time of the overall mine feasibility design. But it will be close. In a sense, the value-added projects keep us as an innovator and a development-stage company longer, so that investors will have a more interesting news flow and more upside over a longer time period.
TMR: Graphite has been an investment theme for a few years. There are a lot of companies that are moving toward production. Is the market looking at a tidal wave of graphite coming on-line soon?
DB: I don’t think so. At the end of the last economic cycle everybody suddenly noticed graphite. The market went from two companies, Northern Graphite and Focus Graphite Inc., to 50 or 60 companies. There may now be as many as 135 different companies and probably several hundred graphite projects at various stages. However, the leader board is pretty small. There’s a long lead time from grassroots exploration to production. In many cases these graphite properties, once you get into the metallurgy, just may not work. I don’t see a tidal wave of new mine supply coming to market. I see possibly two or three new producing mines in the next three or four years.
TMR: What will that new supply do to the market?
DB: The market can handle that quite well. We expect to see prices trending up through 2016. As demand returns, we have to remember that there were no new mines built in the last economic cycle, so the problem is going to be that much more acute. The time to be building to reach that demand is now. We are excited that Lac Knife shows extremely good economics now, at the bottom of the market. It will get even better as prices start to tick up. By the time we’re in production, which should be mid-2016, prices could possibly be as much as $1,000/ton higher than today.
Investors need to keep in mind that with so many components to a graphite deposit, they have to look at each opportunity very carefully. When the market evaluates all the deposits out there, many won’t make the cut and a lot of those companies will just disappear.
TMR: Can you give us an overview of Lac Knife and what makes it a standout project?
DB: The Lac Knife deposit is a 9.5 million ton Measured and Indicated resource at 15% Cg (graphitic carbon). It has excellent infrastructure with road, rail and seaport links and immediate access to the electrical grid. The deposit is at surface and will be a low cost, open-pit mine. The low cost mining method is critical. Another important feature of a commercial graphite deposit is a good distribution of large, medium and fine flake in the ore; that is a feature of Lac Knife. We have demonstrated in our pilot plant that we can recover a potentially economic proportion of the large, medium and fine flake graphite at extremely high-grade carbon. We’re able to remove the flake from the rock while preserving its size and keeping it clean.
The nature of the Lac Knife deposit allows us to produce a high-grade concentrate based upon our ROM crushing, grinding and floatation process, entirely by mechanical means. Our ROM production does not have a purification step through a third party. We’re able to get the Lac Knife flake extremely clean—even the fine sizes. Most deposits can’t do that.
TMR: The financials based on the prefeasibility study or Preliminary Economic Assessment showed about a $126 million ($126M) capex, including a $25M contingency and a nearly 40% internal rate of return (IRR). Can you give us an overview of those financials?
DB: The $126M capex is low for a mining project if you compare it to copper, nickel or gold, which many investors are more familiar with. Compared to those same industries, the IRR is fairly high. Taken together, it is a compelling and unique combination in the graphite industry. A lot of people don’t understand graphite, but they understand a good investment and a high rate of return.
Because we think we are now at the price cycle bottom, the project looks extremely good. The net present value at an 8% discount rate comes in at $317M in pretax numbers with a short 2.4-year payback. From a mining industry perspective, that’s pretty inviting.
TMR: What is the significance of the offtake agreement that Focus recently signed?
DB: The offtake agreement was a first in the graphite industry. There have been some long-term relationships, but as far as having an offtake agreement directly with an end-user, the agreement is historic.
The significance of the offtake agreement is that it demonstrates we can sell our product. No one asks gold, nickel or copper producers if they can sell their product. For those minerals, there are active commodity markets. Not so in graphite. If I am talking to mine financiers about a graphite project, the first thing they will say is, “How will you sell it?” The offtake agreement removes much of that uncertainty and is proof that we can sell our product.
The offtake agreement has a 10-year term and was signed with a Chinese conglomerate. This further underpins what we’ve been saying about the Chinese domestic graphite supply situation. Even within China, people are concerned about a reliable supply. The agreement has a 20,000 ton per year (20 Ktpa) minimum offtake with provisions for up to 90% offtake. Potentially up to 90% of our production could be spoken for. Prices will be set based on current market prices, so if prices rise as we expect, our upside will be protected. The material is all FOB Québec, so we are not paying to ship it to China.
The offtake agreement has had several follow-on positive effects. It has increased the urgency to line up supplies for some battery manufacturers, companies that may have been a little slow out of the gate but are now suddenly nervous about the availability of supply given the growth prospects. Another positive effect of the offtake agreement is that it leaves us room to advance our value-added processing goals. And the offtake agreement advances the company toward production in that it makes the whole financing step that much easier.
TMR: What’s the next step? Financing?
DB: Definitely. We’re in the middle of the feasibility study right now. We are also working through the permitting, especially the mine closure plan. I want to continue the process toward production. That means going directly into detail engineering, the full engineering, procurement and construction management process to build a mine. To do that we need to finance our project. We’re in a due diligence phase on the financing end of things. Because graphite projects are not that common, we’re not going straight to the markets but instead working with people who are interested in graphite.
TMR: What is the timeframe for the feasibility study and goal to get financing secured?
DB: We’re hoping to secure financing in the second quarter of this year. The feasibility study results should be published by late spring/early summer. We’re moving fast to get the project shovel ready by the end of this year. That is contingent upon many things including permitting approval and financing. We will look to overlap some of these timeframes if we can. For example, if the mill design is ready to go before we announce the feasibility study, and we’ve got money in the bank, then we’ll proceed right into detailed engineering on the plant.
TMR: How does rapidly advancing Lac Knife mesh with the long-term goals for the company?
DB: Based on the progress at Lac Knife, Focus Graphite is now a development company. We’re looking to build a mine. The graphite industry is unusual in that it does not have a single large graphite miner. The big companies in graphite are not mining companies. They don’t want to be mining companies. We are in the business to build and operate this mine and then grow from there. The longer-term vision for Focus Graphite is to become the company that consolidates more advanced graphite properties.
TMR: Do any of the international, large-cap miners produce graphite? Companies like Rio Tinto Plc (RIO:NYSE; RIO:ASX; RIO:LSE; RTPPF:OTCPK), BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP:NYSE; BHPLF:OTCPK) and Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX:NYSE), for example?
DB: No, none of them. They’re all into gold, base metals and a few minor industrial minerals. The graphite situation is very similar to the rare earths where the Chinese cratered the markets two decades ago and then made it uneconomic to develop graphite or rare earths anywhere else. I mean, rare earths aren’t rare. They’ve just never been developed outside of China because it wasn’t economic.
The same with graphite. The Chinese in the early 1990s flooded these markets in exchange for foreign currency. The result was both graphite and rare earth mining became uneconomic outside of China. When it was over, there was one operating flake graphite mine in North America. It was small and produced only 20 Ktpa of concentrate. There aren’t the big graphite plays out there that make it interesting for the majors. Further, they’re not used to the market because it is not a deeply traded commodity market. It’s an industrial mineral and it’s a marketing game. That is why the offtake agreement is so important.
TMR: What are three reasons why investors should listen to the graphite story and take a look at Focus Graphite?
DB: First, investors should look at graphite because there is a lot of evidence that graphite is going to be the next big thing. Investors realize that graphite is used in a lot of everyday products, but with the growth of new battery technology and the China supply situation, the world is going to need a whole lot more graphite. The supply/demand story is very compelling.
The second reason investors should look at Focus Graphite is because of our industry first offtake agreement. The agreement is a clear sign that we can sell our product and that a third party has reviewed our plans and done enough due diligence to sign up to do business with us for the long term. The offtake agreement provides a level of investor security that is head and shoulders above our potential competition.
The final reason investors should take a look at Focus Graphite is our overall cost structure and financials. Our production cost will be competitive with the lowest cost producers in China. The financials are compelling based on ROM production and we have options to increase revenue significantly from additional value added processing.
TMR: Thanks for speaking with us.
DB: It has been a pleasure.
Click here for Focus Graphite Corp.’s Corporate Presentation.
Don K.D. Baxter, P.Eng. is the President of Focus Graphite Inc. He served as President of Northern Graphite Corporation between February 2011 and July 2013 and was responsible for all technical aspects relating to the Bissett Creek graphite project including the bankable feasibility study, metallurgical test work and environmental and mine permitting. He also served as mine superintendent at the Kearney Graphite mine when it operated in the 1990s and as a director of mining at Ontario Graphite Ltd. Baxter has worked for Inco and Noranda Minerals, as well as numerous consulting projects for base and precious metals. He holds a degree in mining engineering from Queen’s University, is a Registered Professional Engineer and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
Want to read more Mining Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.
Source: J. Alec Gimurtu
DISCLOSURE:
1) Alec Gimurtu conducted this interview for The Mining Report and provides services to The Mining Report as an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) Focus Graphite Inc. paid The Mining Report to conduct, produce and distribute the interview.
3) Focus Graphite Inc. had final approval of the content and is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Opinions expressed are the opinions of Focus Graphite Inc. and not Streetwise Reports or The Mining Report or its officers.
4) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.
Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2014 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.
Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.
Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
