I was listening to a news report on CNN yesterday covering this travesty surrounding the impending exit of Barack Obama and wife Michelle from the White House and as the commentator described the sequence of events leading up to the January 20th arrival of Mr. Donald J. Trump, you could detect a sense of melancholy in his voice, a faint trace of sadness, of loss, of hopelessness. And I was immediately taken back to the 1960s and the days of Walter Cronkite whose on-air persona was clipped and professional with the only emotion ever observed was when he had to announce the death of JFK in 1963. Those were the days when news was what reporters reported, when news was real, and when markets were free.
Fifty years later, we have CNBC commentators commenting on their “interest rate models” (when the only models of which they are qualified to speak are the ones in the window of Macy’s) and news anchors sounding off on something DJT tweeted or the “safe space” of some liberal arts university being invaded by insult-wielding Trumpladites.
I used to think my father got grumpier as he got older but he really didn’t; he simply grew less tolerant of the things he deemed “idiotic.” That is where I find myself as we roll into 2017 with global markets flirting with record highs despite record debt: GDP levels and borrowing costs on the rise. I am becoming less tolerant of all of the garbage spewed at us in order to make us believe that markets are fine, economies are growing, and gold is a barbarous relic of a bygone era.
However, I have to constantly remind myself of the old adage which was given to me back in 1979 at the end of the inflationary 1970s: “Never underestimate the replacement power of equities within an inflationary spiral” as the printing presses continue to run feverishly with the most recent evidence being a $15 billion bond issue being floated by Italy’s Banca Monte Pasci, one of the oldest banks in the world. The investors buying into this totally insolvent financial institution are undoubtedly central banks or their surrogates such as Deutsche Bank or JPM so the issue being floated is really nothing more than yet another bailout designed to keep the global financial Ponzi scheme in motion.
Now, there is nothing I would love to do this last day of the trading year than put on a massive bet against the stock markets for January but the problem is that you just cannot. Are the markets overvalued based up the Case Shiller P/E at 28.2 times? Of course. Is the S&P 500 index now rolling over with RSI rapidly reversing from an RSI reading above 70, the first such reading since November 2014? Absolutely. Are gold stocks cheap relative to where they were in July-August? Undoubtedly. Then why am I not buying the Gold Miner ETFs and pairing them with the SDS (short S&P500 ETF)? I will tell you why: the stock, bond, and precious metals markets are all linked, correlated, and managed by the coordinated global central banks with the NY Fed controlling the Americas, the Bank of England controlling Europe, and the Bank of Japan controlling Asia, ex-China and Russia. HFT-controlled algorithms are pre-programmed to respond to specific patterns in the markets such as dollar-yen, 10-year bond yield, and, of course, the gold price and all of this combines to create chaos for old-timers who were trained in a free-market environment without the magic hand of the price managers.
Nevertheless, here are a few trades that I put on during the heat of the DJT advance; I was a tad early on all of them and this is what I will hold for the first few weeks of the New Year.
1. Long GDXJ: One look at the COT from last Friday tells me that the junior gold miners led by the GDXJ (VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF) are once again back on the radar screen and I will be looking to add and possibly attempt to replicate the spectacular trade from last year. The Commercials have now pared that massive short position by two-thirds and are actually long nearly 90,000 contracts.
Since the COT structure is now and finally in full “retreat mode” with the Commercials having booked an insane amount of bonus money for 2016, it would appear to this humble scribe that it has now become much less hazardous to go back into the water again, those ominous Deutsche Bank dorsal fins nowhere to be found nor those of their Commercial Carcharodan cohorts, HSBC, Scotia, and UBS. While the Commercials still carry over 12,000,000 phony ounces of synthetic gold on the books as a short position, it is doubtful whether we will see it near the incredible zero level of December 2015; accordingly, I hold a token position in the GDXJ via the Feb $35 calls and will add around the middle of the month, in all likelihood.
2. Long the UVXY (ProShares Trust Ultra VIX Short) from $14.50: I was REALLY early (wrong) on this one as it bottomed at 10.93 a few days ago and I refused to average down because of the leverage that caused the erosion in this little hellion. However, you only have to catch it right once and it can make you a lot of money and that is what I see in January.
3. Short Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX:NYSE) at around $14.40, I will hold this looking for a return to the 200-dma at $11.72. The company lost a boatload of money this year and had a big management shift.
4. Long Western Uranium Corp. (WUC:CNQ): I helped WUC raise some money last year and purchased a chunk of the $1.70 private placement while trying to help them get properly positioned ahead of the big turn coming in the uranium space. However, this is also a vanadium story and one no better told than by the Northern Miner’s Trish Saywell. (The link may require a password.) In addition, the company’s CEO, George Glasier, is interviewed by INN in an interview entitled: Uranium Outlook 2017: CEOs Expect a Better Year .WUC is going to have a very bright 2017 as money flows toward uranium and as I commented in the 2017 Forecast Issue, I added at year end and will continue to add after the 15th of January. I know that uranium falls way outside the realm of “Gold and Gold Miners.”
On Dec. 30, the market opened higher by over 150 Dow points with China “data numbers” kicking the algobots into “Buy Commodities” mode giving FCX a shot in the arm and the VIX a shot in the chops. As you look back three months from Feb. 1, 2017, we’re all going to have an epiphany and realize that we should all have “bought the election and sold the inauguration” but I think that stocks will begin to discount that by end of this week. Institutional money flows favor up markets in the first few trading session of January which is why I usually take the pulse of the markets after the first five trading sessions, again at mid-month, and then at month-end to get a feeling for how the year MAY progress. Mind you, it was a great deal simpler before interventions, algobots, and soon-to-be Commander-in-Chiefs firing off tweets every five minutes about official U.S. policy on trade, markets, and foreign affairs.
If there was one simple resolution I made for 2017, it was to refrain from letting the constant shenanigans that prevail in the markets in which I toil lure me into “aberrant” as opposed to “abhorrent” behaviors that will affect those that live with and around me. However, reading that DJT threatened General Motors with a “border tax” for building cars in Mexico, you have to wonder what this wonderful New Year truly has in store for us.
Originally trained during the inflationary 1970s, Michael Ballanger is a graduate of Saint Louis University where he earned a Bachelor of Science in finance and a Bachelor of Art in marketing before completing post-graduate work at the Wharton School of Finance. With more than 30 years of experience as a junior mining and exploration specialist, as well as a solid background in corporate finance, Ballanger’s adherence to the concept of “Hard Assets” allows him to focus the practice on selecting opportunities in the global resource sector with emphasis on the precious metals exploration and development sector. Ballanger takes great pleasure in visiting mineral properties around the globe in the never-ending hunt for early-stage opportunities.
Disclosure:
1) Michael Ballanger: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of Western Uranium Corp. and I consult for the company. I am short FCX from last November via put options. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.
Source: Michael J. Ballanger for The Gold Report (1/4/17)