The grade or concentration of a mineral or metal in ore directly affects costs associated with mining as well as its subsequent beneficiation and extraction of precious components.
Under otherwise equal conditions, a lower grade means a higher cost per unit weight of extracted metal making high-grade ore deposits a crucial consideration for all types of investors in mining.
The grade of metal in ore changes over time and every year publicly traded and other mining companies routinely reevaluate, recalculate and report mineable reserves applying different variables, with commodity prices fluctuations being the most important contributor for upgrades/downgrades in reserves.
This analysis covers those currently active gold operations throughout the world that are separate reporting units and which have recent reserves evaluation figures disclosed by the owners/operators.
Why only reserves have taken into account? This is because mineral reserve is the part of mineral resource that demonstrated economic viability in current market conditions. Therefore, ore reserves are way less speculative than ore resources and relatively precisely reflect changes in economic “wellbeing” of mines.
For more accurate basis of comparison, gold operations have been split into underground and open-pit, since these mining methods utilize different techniques/equipment and it does make sense to identify “the best in the breed” gold operations within one mining category, first. In this research, focus has been made on ore grade in reserves while putting aside other crucial parameters like ore tonnage and volume of metal contained in ore.
Here is the list of the world’s top ten open-pit and underground gold operations in terms of ore grade, based on available 2014 data.
Data retrieved from the IntelligenceMine database, which provides researchers, investors and suppliers with up to date global mining market intelligence – mining and mineral exploration company reports; mine, project and processing facility reports; securities filings; an interactive mapper and much more. Learn more about IntelligenceMine.
1. With 44.1 g/t of gold in reserves, Fire Creek mine, owned by Klondex Mines and located in Nevada, United States, is believed to be the highest grade underground gold mine in the world.
2. Macassa gold operations, Ontario, Canada, owned by Kirkland Lake Gold Inc., is part of one of Canada’s oldest and richest systems. The Kirkland Lake Main Break system boasts production of 24 million troy ounces of gold over a span of 86 years and average historic grade of 16.5 g/t. With 22.2 g/t average gold grade reported in reserves, South Mine complex of Macassa operations holds the second place.
3. Kedrovka mine, Republic of Buryatia, Russia, owned by the local Zapadnaya Gold Mining company, enjoys the third highest grade underground mine and has a 22 g/t average ore grade in reserves. The mine is currently focused on the Osinovaya vein – a huge quartz vein, which has significant exploration upside potential with at least 100 identified veins.
4. Barrick’s Turquoise Ridge mine complex (Nevada, United States), fourth in our ranking with 16.9 g/t gold in reserves, has considerable untapped potential and is becoming a core operation for Barrick.
5. Part of Newcrest’s Gosowong mine complex in Indonesia, Toguraci mine sits at fifth with 16 g/t grade of gold in reserves.
6. Peruvian Orcopampa mine, owned by Buenaventura, is sixth with 15.8 g/t gold grade.
7. Dvoinoye mine holds seventh place with 15g/t gold, being a part of Kinross’ Kupol operations and located in the Far East of Russia within the Chukotka Autonomous Region.
8. Pinson mine, Atna Resources’ underground operation in Nevada, United States, eighth in our list with 13.8 g/t gold grade in reserves.
9. Midas mine of Klondex Mines (Nevada, United States), is ninth with 12.9 g/t gold grade.
10. Chilean Pimenton mine, owned by Cerro Grande Mining, is tenth with 11.1 g/t gold grade.
After we have identified highest grade underground gold operations, the second step is to lookup for the leader amongst them when apply two components combined; ore grade and volume of gold contained in reserves, which is derived from ore reserves tonnage in-situ and grade (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Grade/contained gold relationship for the top 10 highest grade underground mines.
As shown in Figure 1, Barrick’s Turquoise Ridge production unit is out of competition, being both high-grade and high-tonnage underground gold mine operation.
Polymetal’s Albazino open-pit mine. Source: ICT Group.
As can be seen, four Polymetal’s open-pit gold mines in Russia are in the top list, which is remarkable achievement.
Albazino and Gounkoto mines are the leaders amongst highest grade open-pit operations when consider ore grade and volume of gold contained in reserves, combined (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Grade/contained gold relationship for the top 10 highest grade open-pit mines.
16 Comments
GoldMan
The first list is incorrect. Klondex Mine’s Fire Creek mine in Nevada should be on there.
Author
Thanks for the feedback GoldMan. We’re following
up on Fire Creek and will update the report accordingly.
Some Miner
More errors. What about Gold Corp’s red lake? 19g/t or higher
Mark
Where does Pascua Lama, if it comes into production, sit on the list?
David
You are missing Lundin’s Fruta del Norte in Ecuador: 9.59g/t Au containing 7.26 million oz and an inferred mineral resource of approximately 5.46 g/t Au containing 2.55 million oz.
Mark
You are missing ABM resources Australia ASX (ABU), next 2 1/4s Jly-Sep & Oct Nov 2015 will be maiden production run 12-15 gpt, Mining operation has started mining as open pit. The trial mining run produced > 3200oz from between 8 – 9,000 tonnes of ore at 85% recovery the new plant is performing at 95% while still accumulating gold in circuit, expected to be 97-98% recovery once the plant is saturated.
Mark
P.S ABM Resources Old Pirate Mine has
640,000 ounces averaging @ 11.7g/t
Trial Mining Head grade was 15.4 gpt
Scorpion
Makes Condor Resources (Lse:Cnr) look like an extremely attractive investment.
csminer
There is a more glaring problem
with this article that shows a general lack of understanding and it is in the opening
comment “The grade or concentration of a mineral or metal in ore directly
affects costs associated with mining, etc”. The costs are the costs. A
tonne of rock needs drilling, blasting, mucking, trucking crushing and grinding
etc. There is difference in cost between development and production tonnes ore
/ waste dependent upon mining methods etc. But take a single stope for example.
Part of it may be very high grade and part low grade with an average grade
somewhere in-between. The cost per tonne of getting the high grade and the low
grade ore to the surface is the same and unaffected by the grade. Higher grades
just mean you can have high costs and still make money. That’s why we have cut
off grade. Material below cut-off is unprofitable because there is less
recoverable contained value that the cost of liberating the value. However the cost
of mining a comparable tonne below cut-off and above is the same.
.
Nouveau_Agricola
The author was referring to the cost per unit weight of extracted metal (refer to second paragraph) with the point being that all other things being equal, a higher grade generally means lower total cost per ounce. The grade does not affect the cost but affects the calculation of the cost. I’m sure he will try harder to get his articles word perfect for you in future.
Michael Alyoshin
Am I alone thinking that 0.1Moz vs 3Moz mines comparison doesn’t make a lot of sense??
BayStBully
KGI struggles to produce at 15 g/t so “operationally” 22.2 g/t is not accurate … this article has too many apples and oranges (plums and pears) to be valid or relevant.
Lindsay Newland Bowker
Interesting analysis but incomplete if the aim to is create a full and meaningful basis for evaluating the actual and life of mine value of a resource and whether it should even be considered a “resource”. Few miners( actually none that I’ve seen are qualified mine economists or qualified experts in in mine finance. Also financial “viability” must include costs to produce using proven methods and technologies that control and avoid accruing environmental liability, the structure terms and costs of debt, capital costs per tonne of annual capacity. I agree that “financial feasibility” is constantly moving and changing based on global markets and global market conditions. I don’t agree that even the top miners undertake the rigorous well informed constant reassessment you suggest is the norm.
Mark Harder
Given some of the comments below, I think it’s worth repeating that Mining.com is not a technical report for investors. Articles like this one are of general interest to folks like myself who are interested in geology, prospecting, mining and the industry in general. I don’t expect much more than that. On the other hand, I wouldn’t know how to discriminate between the different levels of sophistication that could be applied to interpreting the given data. Therefore, its useful to read the comments of those who are more knowledgeable than I.
Frankly Mudeer
What
about the Zaruma Mine that Dynasty Metals and Mining (DMM.TO) placed into
production 5 quarters ago. 2.5 million ounces total resources with 1.094 million ounces of measured and indicated at an average grade of 12.83 gpt and 1.448 million ounces at 12.2 gpt inferred. In the first quarter
of commercial production (Q3 2013) they mined high grade resource material at an average 15.1 gpt. Since then they were working through some underground
development issues, which have been dealt with and should get back up to a 10
gpt head grade going forward and mining at approximately 500 tpd. The Zaruma mill has a current processing capacity of 300,000 tonnes per annum and can be easily upgraded to 800,000 tpa with additional CAPEX of $3 – 4 million.
Dale Holmgren
What I conclude from this is that one should invest in Klondex Mines. Fortunately, I did a long time ago, and expect to profit for years to come.