Gasoline consumption in the United States has been dropping for years. In the last decade, vehicle fuel efficiency has improved by 20%, and the combination of that shift and a weak economy of late has pushed gasoline demand to its lowest level in a decade.
At the same time, US oil production is at its highest level in a decade. Deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico and horizontal fracs in the Bakken shale have turned America’s domestic oil production scene around. After 20 years of declining production, US crude output rates started to climb in 2008 and have increased every year since.
With production up and demand down, the basics of supply and demand indicate that oil prices should be falling. Americans should be paying less at the pump.
Instead, the average US price at the pump reached US$3.80 per gallon on March 5, after 27 consecutive days of gains. That’s 26.7¢ above the old record for March 5, set last year. The price of gasoline has climbed 32¢ or 9.3% since February 1; analysts expect prices to continue rising, reaching a national average of something like US$4.25 per gallon.
What gives? Is it all about Iran? Are speculators manipulating the market? Do any politicians have good ideas on how to “fix” the high cost of gasoline? And is there relief on the horizon?
What gives is a combination of forces. Rising tensions in the Middle East are part of the problem, but so are deficiencies in North America’s oil infrastructure that are causing price discrepancies across the nation. Some of the refineries being forced to pay premium prices for oil are shutting down, and that limits gasoline supplies in parts of the country. Speculation is also a factor, as it is an ingrained part of the market, but it is not the driving force behind America’s fuel-price problems.
If you’re wondering, there aren’t any politicians with novel, sound ideas on how to reduce fuel prices. Newt Gingrich’s promise to bring prices below $2.50 a gallon is as attainable as Michelle Bachmann’s plucked-out-of-the-air promise of $2 gasoline.
Thankfully though, there is some relief on the horizon. First, we’ll tackle the issues. Then we’ll outline some developments that should ease the pain.
A Two-Part Problem
Two main forces are driving fuel prices upward in the United States: high global oil prices and the state of the US oil transportation and refining industry.
High oil prices are the more obvious part of the problem and are certainly the part that attracts the most attention. Tensions in the Middle East have been elevated since Tunisia’s revolution kick-started the Arab Spring in January 2011. Subsequent revolutions in Egypt and Libya as well as the oftentimes violent suppression of dissent in Bahrain, Jordan, and now Syria have kept questions about the stability of supplies from the oil-important Middle East front and center all year.
Now, of course, it’s Iran that is keeping oil traders up at night. Between oil embargoes against the country and threats from Iran to block the Strait of Hormuz (a maritime passageway vital to the oil industry), the growing rift between Iran and the Western world is threatening supplies from the world’s fourth-largest producer. That’s a surefire way to push oil prices skyward.
The result: Brent North Sea (the pricing benchmark for crude oil traded in Europe) climbed above US$100 per barrel a year ago and hasn’t looked back. Since last February Brent crude has traded above US$110 per barrel more often than not, and has regularly topped US$120 per barrel.
The Middle East’s ongoing tensions also lifted crude prices in North America: After sitting comfortably near US$80 per barrel for most of 2010, the price for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose above US$100 several times during 2011 and averaged close to US$90. Yes, it moved much less than did Brent; moreover, not all crude oils in North America had similar boosts. To understand that situation, we have to delve into America’s oil transportation and refining system.
The US is divided into five oil districts, which were originally designed to ensure energy security during World War II. Things have certainly evolved since then, but the districts remain less connected than you might think. Crude oil cannot necessarily flow from one side of the country to the other or from one producing region to another refining area. The system’s disconnectedness means that refiners in different regions are forced to pay whatever the price may be for the crude oil they can access – and those prices differ significantly.
East-Coast refiners have traditionally relied on imported oil from Europe and West Africa, which means they pay Brent pricing for most of their crude. As such, Brent’s surging price has dealt a blow to East-Coast refiners, hitting several so hard that they are shutting down. No fewer than four refineries serving the East Coast are going or have gone offline since 2010, eliminating almost half of the gasoline previously supplied to the US Northeast. Knowing that, high gasoline prices in the Northeast start to make a bit more sense: Refiners’ costs have been sky high, and refinery shutdowns have eliminated a huge chunk of supply.
Similarly, refiners on the West Coast receive some supply from Alaska but depend on internationally priced crude for the bulk of their input. Their need to pay Brent pricing explains why gas prices in California are regularly among the highest in the nation.
At the other end of the spectrum are refiners in the Midwest. The oil hub at Cushing, Oklahoma, is being increasingly inundated with crude oil as production ramps up in North Dakota’s Bakken formation and in Canada’s oil sands. Crude from both of those rapidly-expanding oil regions flows primarily to Cushing, where refineries process as much as they can. Those refiners are able to buy at WTI pricing, which has held a roughly 20% discount to Brent crude for the last year. That helps keep gasoline prices in the Midwest a little lower.
However, Midwest refineries are generally designed to process light, sweet oil, which means they can handle output from the Bakken but are not up to processing heavy oil from the sands. Oil-sands crude needs to go to the Gulf Coast, where an army of sophisticated refineries are thirsty for heavy oil. All that is lacking is a pipeline to connect supply with demand, but at the moment there is no such pipe; thus, the supply glut at Cushing has discounted heavy oil significantly. Western Canada Select, the benchmark crude oil coming out of Canada’s oil sands, closed at US$74.73 per barrel on March 5, a 30% discount to WTI and a 40% discount to Brent.
There is cheap oil available in the United States. You just have to be able to transport the crude from Cushing to your personal refinery to take advantage of it.
One final element is making matters worse: Refineries are currently starting to shift to producing spring-summer gasoline blends, which are lighter and therefore usually cost about 10¢ more per gallon than fall-winter blends. And this year, the quick refinery shutdowns needed to enact the seasonal shift are creating slight supply gaps because some of the “swing” refineries that usually help bridge the gap are no longer operating. For example, the Hovensa refinery in the US Virgin Islands – a joint venture between Hess Corp. (NYSE.HES) and Petroleos de Venezuela – used to produce extra volume during the seasonal transition, but it was closed down a few weeks ago after losing $1.3 billion over the last three years.
Lights on the Horizon
Both sides of the problem – high oil prices and insufficiencies in America’s oil infrastructure – will develop over the next 12 months. On the infrastructure side, we can be pretty certain that the developments will be positive. One pipeline that for years has carried oil north from the Gulf to Cushing is being reversed, which will start to ease the heavy-oil glut within weeks. TransCanada recently announced that it is seeking expedited approval to start construction of the southern leg of its Keystone XL pipeline, which will also connect Cushing to the Gulf Coast. Since there is nothing controversial about the southern portion of the project it should be approved quickly, in which case TransCanada hopes to have the pipeline built and operational by the middle of next year.
These pipelines will enable America’s army of Gulf Coast oil refineries to purchase North American crude oil. When that happens, Western Canada Select will not maintain its current 40% discount to Brent, but it will almost certainly remain cheaper than its European counterpart, creating cost savings for US refiners that they will pass on to consumers.
As for high oil prices in general, the biggest question there is Iran. If Iran blockades the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices will shoot up. If Israel or the US sends in air strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, the same thing will happen. The average price of gas in the United States would likely top US$5 per gallon. However, if war can be avoided, the price of oil should start to recede as fears abate; if oil sanctions against Iran stay in place, Saudi Arabia should be able to step up production enough to replace the lost volumes. Under this scenario the price of a barrel of Brent oil could fall below $100.
The level of warmongering from all sides seems to change on a daily basis, so we are not prepared to make any predictions about whether an attack on Iran is imminent. However, there are ways savvy energy investors can profit from this uncertain situation as well as other shifting trends. Get our free 2012 Energy Forecast to get started today.
By Marin Katusa
18 Comments
M. Simon
Oil outlook from Iran: http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/01/oil-outlook.html
By 2015 it is estimated Iran will have no oil to export. The embargo just speeds up that timetable a bit.
Vince Brown
For the total layman, a lot of very useful information on some of the inner workings on how pricing works. Greatly appreciated.
anilpetra
How can we take seriously an article on gasoline prices without the word “OPEC”, basic information on the cartel’s successful restraints on output, or the potential oligopoly shattering impact of ‘drill baby drill’ policies here at home?
Destabilize OPEC and watch international crude oil output rise dramatically. We’ll quickly see global prices at a secular low.
Bubblehead
Best way to do that is to develop more oil outside of OPEC – the US, Canada, Brazil, etc. Make it irrelevant.
FreemonSandlewould
So no blame for Barry Obama who blocked said pipeline from Canada ???
come on.
Blacque Jacques Shellacque
“Their need to pay Brent pricing explains why gas prices in California are regularly among the highest in the nation.”
What, no mention of the California pollution requirements and the state tax increase (raised to 35 cents from the previous 17 cents) that also adds to the price?
brianmacker
“Two main forces are driving fuel prices upward in the United States”
No, actually three. The third and most important is the tripling of the base money supply by the Fed. All other things being equal this alone is enough to triple gas prices.
drkennethnoisewater
What about the devalued dollar? Also IIRC the biggest US export is processed fuels..
Matthew Borcherding
Good but incomplete breakdown….
The decline of the US dollar, greatly accelerated under Obama, is a huge part of the problem. Oil is a world-wide commodity. As the value of the dollar falls, the price of oil rises. The dollar under Obama has been greatly weakened.
The US has also burdened itself with a regulatory patchwork of different required gasoline blends. Different states require different formulations. Therefore, gas at the consumer level isn’t particularly fungible. I’m not normally a fan of the Feds putting the hammer down, but this is one place where it probably should. Force the States to
And then there’s sales taxes. Unless you live in one of the few states without sales taxes, your retail gas purchases are all burdened by sales tax. As the untaxed price of retail gas goes up and up, the absolute price of sales tax continues to rise and rise as well. Good for state coffers, not good for their residents.
Add in rising regulatory costs of oil production, refining, and distribution. (Plus general rises of regulatory costs affecting all US businesses.)
Add in the boondoggle payoff for Midwest corn producers — ethanol — now required to be used in most gasoline blends.
And I’m certainly still missing a few other causes of note…
UncleFred
It is MUCH worse than requiring different formulations at the state level. The requirements over much smaller regions. For example in my state different formulations have been set for two adjacent counties. Two stations a half mile apart which sell the same brand of fuel cannot sell the same formulations. Consider the cost implications of transport and production.
way too experienced
Your analysis of U.S. consumption and infrastructure issues are well taken, but your assessment of mid-East security related speculation is overdrawn. Oil futures track NYSE futures closely and exhibit no expectation of any event that would significantly constrict crude oil flow from that region.
Global oil demand is the largest factor in setting global oil pricing. There can not be hundreds of thousands of new drivers on the roads of China and India, and thousands of new factories, without outsized increases in demand from these mostly non-oil producing nations. Steady industrial development thoughout the world ads to demand at a faster rate than the slowing ecomonies of Europe, the U.S. and Japan can relax it.
Finally, one must factor in the steep decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, the primary oil trading currency world wide. Studies I was reading in mid-winter were assigning a value of about 60 cents per gallon to currency devalutation.
Oil is a market, and all the factors that affect markets are reflected in its price. it is not simply a question of supply and demand.
Adjoran
There isn’t any significant “risk premium” or “speculation” component of oil prices. They are fully in line with supply and demand figures.
Domestic gas refining now must produce scores of different blends for different markets, and there is a cost to this. The economy of scale cannot be repealed. Also, the fact we built our last refinery nearly 40 years ago and are running much closer to full capacity than used to be considered prudent is certainly a factor as well.
TW VanHican
Prices are determined by supply and demand – and speculation. The government can plan nothing and the free-market can perfectly control everything, yet, the oil infrastructure is deficient. 2003 was only 9 years ago, and oil was only $30/bbl. Imagine what Detroit could do with 300% increases in their products every decade. Your PC is 50% the cost it was 10 years ago, and your HDTV is 25% the cost. New production technology is to blame for that.
So your food cost more because your oil is 300% higher. Iran is a concern but Saudi can make up the difference (supply won’t change, but price is affected anyhow).
Algae farms, new production technology, can produce oil for $50/bbl, constantly, forever, but that would require the human beast to evolve another level, so, maybe after ww3.
McCain’s campaign slogan is “re-elect me because I know how to get military spending for Arizona”. Maybe Arizonans should seek a Senator who will get algae farming money for Arizona.
Sj_kac
“Algae farms, new production technology, can produce oil for $50/bbl, constantly, forever,”
Oil from the Gulf of Mexico is in small pools, developed over millions of years of plankton falling to the sea floor.
To grow algae in large enough quantities to make any difference would take an area the size of the Gulf of Mexico itself. That is crazy.
TMLutas
Algae oil is bioengineered to be largely lipids which can be refined up to gasoline and diesel. The process is very different from historic natural petroleum production. Algae has a production cycle of 1-10 days and a variable yield with up to 60% of dry weight being usable lipids. It’s still uneconomic at present state of the art but the gap is a lot smaller than you’re making it out to be and it’s shrinking.
bagger1956
Every time I read a post like yours I have to ask – do you think the US is the only country in the world? If it is so easy to get alternative fuels at competitive prices, then why aren’t the Germans or the Japanese or the Chinese or some other smart people with no oil companies developing these fuels for themselves? The answer is there are no altenative fuels that are cost competitive to gas/oil/coal and there won’t be any for many years. The US needs to develop and produce its fossil fuels while it continues researching other fuels for the future.
mechanic540
Why did I know that at the end of this article a plug for a directed investment vehicle would show up.All that noise about refinin,g which does make an impact ,and then a total bail by saying Iran Iran Iran 3 times real fast. Get serious here.Supply, crap dollar value and refining shortage,Thats it in a nutshell.Next story.
Ken Watson
Glad to see the currency issues so well addressed in the comments. While algae biofuels are one of the less problematic “alternatives” to drilling, the enthusiasm is far premature. Better to end the disastrous involvement of the government in the energy market than try to plump up biofuels since their advantages are pretty marginal except only carbon emissions, which is BS. I do fault the experts above and below, though. No, oil is NOT dinosaurs and their last meals. It is produced from abiotic organic processes deep in the earth. No, peak oil is not here and neither is it on the horizon except from regulatory imposition.