Canada’s Tahoe Resources (TSX:THO)(NYSE:TAHO) is laying off 250 employees, or roughly a quarter of the staff from its flagship Escobal silver mine, in Guatemala, as a legal battle to having the mining license for the site reinstated drags on.
The Vancouver-based company had to halt operations at the mine last July after the country’s Supreme Court provisionally ordered so following an appeal from environment and human rights organization CALAS. The group alleged the Ministry of Energy and Mines had not consulted with the Xinca indigenous people before awarding the license to Tahoe’s local unit, Minera San Rafael.
Tahoe says the Guatemalan Constitutional Court heard appeals of the Supreme Court’s decision to reinstate the Escobal mining license on Oct. 25, but has not issued a verdict of its own despite being required to do so within five days of the public hearing.
Originally, Tahoe was prepared to face a three-month mine suspension, period during which 5.1 million ounces of silver production were expected to be deferred, and about $10 million lost. But after six months of waiting, the company had to take cost-cutting measures and warned it may have to lay off even more people down the road.
Escobal, the world’s third largest silver mine, began commercial production in 2014 and drove Tahoe’s record cash flow and strong first quarter 2017 results. Prior to the licence suspension, it employed 1,030 people, 97% of whom are Guatemalan, with at least half of them from the Santa Rosa region.
The underground operation, located in southeast Guatemala, about 3 km from San Rafael Las Flores, produced a record 21.2 million ounces of silver in concentrate in 2016.
But it has also been a source of polemic. Last summer, protesters blocked access to the mine, delaying shipments and supplies. Tahoe is also facing action in Canada’s court system by a group of Guatemalan for alleged violence at a protest outside Escobal in 2013.
The mining licences of the Tahoe’s Escobal unit as well as the smaller Juan Bosco have both been suspended since July 5.
If the court decides to reinstate the licence in the next few weeks, the need for additional job cuts could be eliminated, the company said.
2 Comments
Jamie Kneen
Curious how an organization dedicated to the legal defence of Indigenous rights, human rights, and the environment is characterised as simply “anti-mining.” Sort of undermines the argument that the industry respects those principles, no?
Scott Wood
Interesting how the the 97% “indigenous” folks are being let go because the other indigenous want to stop the mining. In my experience the folks not working at the mine are being paid by the anti-mining NGO’s to oppose the mining. If you were to talk to the guys being laid off they are wondering if the NGO’s are going to put food on their tables and provide other jobs.
I have written on this before and am sick of the NGO’s that incite the locals to violence so they can create an international scene. What is a security guy going to do when somebody comes at them with a machete and they have no place to go. Violence begets violence and it would be interesting to know in truth which side started the whole problem but will bet it was the NGO’s
.