Ivanhoe’s Kipushi zinc mine in the DRC officially reopens
The restart marked exactly a century since the mine first went into production.
Japan’s Sumitomo Metal Mining (SMM) confirmed on Thursday its support for Teck Resources’ (TSX: TECK.A, TECK.B) (NYSE: TECK) planned spinoff into two companies in the face of an alternative proposal from Glencore (LON: GLEN), which wants to buyout Canada’s largest diversified miner.
The company, one of Teck’s top shareholders, holds 18.9% of the Class A shares and 0.1% of the Class B shares of Teck. It also has a 49% stake in Temagami Mining, which itself holds 55% of Teck’s Class A shares.
The Vancouver-based mining giant operates under a dual-class structure, in which Class A shares are each worth 100 votes. Class B shares are worth one vote each.
SMM and Teck have a decades-long partnership in mining, including the joint development and construction of the Pogo gold mine in Alaska, and the Quebrada Blanca copper mine in Chile.
Teck is trying to get backing for its proposed restructuring ahead of a shareholder vote on the proposal on April 26. It wants to to split up its metal and steelmaking coal businesses into two companies, Teck Metals and Elk Valley Resources.
POSCO, both a customer and a JV partner with Teck on its Elkview and Greenhills operations, as well as China Steel Corporation, are among the shareholders that have backed the Canadian miner in the last 24 hours.
Glencore published on Wednesday an open letter to Teck shareholders, saying it was open to talk improvements to its proposal directly with Teck shareholders if the board continued to rebuff its offer.
The Canadian company quickly replied by saying that Teck has previously engaged “extensively” with Glencore – for six months on “essentially the same proposal” – and repeatedly determined it is not in the best interest of its shareholders.
Glencore’s initial bid represented a 20% premium to Teck’s March 26 closing price, when it was privately made.
The Swiss miner and commodities trader has indicated it could raise its current $23 billion bid if shareholders vote against Teck’s plans next week.
Comments
Steve
TECK has two classes of common shares, A and B. The only difference in the two classes is that class A shares have 100 votes each and class B shares have 1 vote each. In the legal document that established the dual share classes it specifically states that in the event of a takeover that class B shares will receive equal compensation to class A shares.
TECK management has proposed that TECK be split into two companies. I have received a proxy statement to vote on several resolutions in an April 26 stockholders’ meeting which are designed to split TECK into a coal mining company and a copper mining company. But far more importantly from class B shareholders’ viewpoint the split would result in class A shares being worth significantly more than class B shares. You can find out more about this topic by reading the TECK “Notice of Meeting and Management Proxy Circular” beginning on page 122.
https://www.teck.com/media/Information-Circular-2023.pdf
If TECK management revises the terms of the split to where the class B shares would receive equal value to the class A shares then I would give serious consideration to voting for the split.
I urge all my fellow class B shareholders to vote against every resolution on the proxy.