Mining’s old guard needs strong medicine
A new report details subpar investor returns in the mining industry over the last decade, particularly big cap diversified companies which have not adapted to new realities.
According to a new study of private capital in the resources sector from industry tracker Preqin investment firms now have $400 billion assets under management after 10 years of uninterrupted growth.
Of this $239 billion represent unrealized value with the remaining $161 billion so-called dry-powder capital ready to invest.
2015 could be the first year since 2004 in which positive net capital has been distributed to natural resources investors
Preqin says unrealized value as a proportion of assets under management has remained relatively constant in recent years, representing approximately 60% of total industry assets each year since 2010.
As investments mature, the gap between capital called-up and proceeds distributed has narrowed. For the first time, in September 2015 (the latest data available), the amount distributed to investors ($38bn) exceeded the amount called up by fund managers ($36bn).
Should trends continue, 2015 should be the first year since 2004 in which positive net capital has been distributed to natural resources investors in unlisted funds says the London-HQed research firm.
Some $131.3 billion is available for investment in energy (oil, gas, coal and renewables) which is by far the number one sector targeted by these funds, but the growth in dry powder since 2010 across natural resources has been phenomenal with the metals & mining sector capital ready to invest seeing a fourfold increase.
Only $6.2 billion of the dry powder money in 2016 is for metals and mining although a portion of energy capital and the diversified funds’ $9.7 billion will also go into projects and assets in the sector. Fund managers also still have to exit some $8.7 billion in mining investments.
Preqin data show in terms of risk versus return energy funds have the highest median net internal rate of return (+5.9%) but the second highest risk profile, with a standard deviation of net IRR at 14.9%. Unlisted metals & mining funds have the highest risk (19.6%) and the second highest median net IRR (+5.3%). Of the funds tracked by the research firm agriculture and farmland funds have the lowest risk-return profile.
[gview file=”https://www.preqin.com/docs/reports/Preqin-Special-Report-Natural-Resources-Performance-June-2016.pdf”]
9 Comments
Mark Harder
Sorry, but I still think of folks like the heavy equipment driver above when I think of miners doing mining and taking the real risks, the ones that could kill you, when I hear the words ‘miner’ and ‘mining’. I know, I know what sorts of risks you mean, but isn’t there another way to talk about this? BTW, where was MSHA when this photo was taken?
CarlJRtall
Please tell me the picture is not real……..
Ray
The picture is tilted to the right – fraud
UkraineTiger
Yes it is at 45 degrees but even when corrected it is still scary.
Honheree
Here it is slope corrected
MINING.com Editors
Thanks Honheree. Looks a lot less risky now
Mark Harder
I think the camera was tilted counter-clockwise. Otherwise a.) Rolling out there in a machine would be suicidal and b.) those boulders under the digger would have rolled down the canyon long ago – warning all fools to stay away. Then again, life is cheap in some parts of the world….
MINING.com Editors
Here’s a better quality version of the image (can’t vouch for the authenticity unfortunately): http://bit.ly/1Yi4UqZ
Matthew Chaudhry
That is one fearless driver.