Alberta to introduce ‘modern’ coal policy, including ban on new open-pit projects
The new policy will not affect those qualified as "advanced coal projects" such as the controversial Grassy Mountain mine.
A recent study by researchers at the University College London found that it is possible to phase out fossil fuels without sacrificing electoral popularity—even in coal mining regions.
Published in the American Political Science Review, the study reviews the Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) government’s policy to phase out coal mining, which was negotiated with affected unions and businesses shortly before Spain’s 2019 national election. Under the resulting “Just Transition Agreement,” 28 coal mines were to be closed by the end of 2019 in three provinces—Asturias, Teruel, and León—and the government agreed to provide €250 million in support to affected workers and investment in affected municipalities, spread over eight years (2019–2027).
The researchers used statistical methods to compare the change in PSOE’s vote share relative to the preceding election in municipalities subject to the agreement with its change in vote share in similar, non-coal regions.
They found that the margin by which PSOE’s vote share increased was higher in the coal mining municipalities, implying that the agreement boosted PSOE’s vote in those communities. Further statistical tests and interviews conducted by the research team suggest that this electoral boost was driven by unions’ support of the agreement.
“The study has important implications for how political parties can craft popular climate policy,” Fergus Green, lead author of the paper, said in a media statement. “It can help inform policymakers who are worried about the political risks of adopting climate policies that impose costs on particular industries and communities.”
In Green’s view, this work underscores the political value of a holistic policy approach to the net-zero transition that extends beyond actions that merely reduce greenhouse gas emissions to encompass broader industrial, regional, social, and labour market policies.
In addition, it shows that the process matters. In the Spanish case, dialogue among the government, unions, and businesses built trust and confidence among affected stakeholders and led to an agreement that all parties could support. The unions, in turn, played a constructive intermediating role that built support for the agreement and for PSOE ahead of the election, in coal-mining communities.
The authors, however, acknowledged that in the Spanish case, It helped that the industry was small, relatively concentrated, and faced a weak economic outlook independently of the government’s climate policy.
“These factors both incentivized and facilitated a negotiated solution. In contexts where fossil fuel production is more profitable, negotiating such agreements is politically harder,” the statement reads. “Accordingly, policies aimed at reducing demand for fossil fuels have a crucial role to play in creating the economic conditions that make policies to phase out supply more politically feasible.”
Whether government climate policies target fossil fuel supply or demand, the research shows that the difficult politics of climate change can be managed by incorporating affected stakeholders in the decision-making process and providing a credible pathway for livelihoods beyond fossil fuels.
