A new calculation model developed by researchers at the Technical University of Munich revealed that heating and cooking with natural gas often has a greater impact on the climate than commonly believed.
“We wanted to know whether—when gas leakage is also considered—gas or electricity is more climate-friendly for heating and cooking,” Florian Dietrich, lead author of the paper that describes the model, said in a media statement.
In collaboration with researchers at ETH Zurich, the University of Utrecht and the Dutch Organization for Applied Research in Natural Sciences TNO, Dietrich used a high-tech measurement station to capture carbon dioxide, methane and carbon monoxide. He and his colleagues also used laser spectrometers for onsite methane measurements. They then combined all variables in a specially designed calculation model.
At the 2019 Munich Oktoberfest, for example, the researchers observed that 1.4% of the gas used was lost. With a total volume of 185,000 cubic meters, this means that 2,500 cubic meters of unused gas was released into the atmosphere.
“Our calculation model takes into account these amounts of escaped natural gas and provides a comprehensive emission factor for evaluating the use of natural gas for cooking and heating purposes,” Dietrich said.
To determine whether natural gas or electricity is the more climate-friendly option, however, the power mix is decisive.
“A high share of renewables reduces the emission factor for electricity, while the use of electricity from such sources as coal-fired power stations has the opposite effect,” Dietrich explained.
By incorporating all of these factors into their calculation model, the researchers created a quantitative basis for identifying the countries where electricity is already a more climate-friendly choice than natural gas. They also concluded what the other countries need to do to arrive at this point.
“When we factor in leakage and incomplete combustion, a smaller share of renewable energy sources in the electric power mix is needed than previously assumed,” Jia Chen, co-author of the paper, said.
Consequently, it is possible for most countries to make the switch from gas to electricity at a much earlier stage.
Looking at individual countries, this means that Canada, for example, with its high share of hydroelectric power, could already rely entirely on electricity for heating and cooking from a climate protection standpoint. In China the picture is different: due to the dominant role of coal in the power mix, electricity causes higher CO2 emissions than gas assuming identical energy output.
For Germany, despite the rapidly increasing share of wind and solar energy, electricity is not yet clearly better than gas. Similarly, in 18 of the 25 countries evaluated in the study, including Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan and Australia, electricity is not yet superior to gas in climate terms. However, the new research shows that electricity will soon be the more climate-friendly alternative for many of those countries due to the ongoing expansion of renewables.
