Alberta to introduce ‘modern’ coal policy, including ban on new open-pit projects
The new policy will not affect those qualified as "advanced coal projects" such as the controversial Grassy Mountain mine.
Research led by the University of Utah has documented elevated concentrations of rare earth elements, or REEs, in active mines rimming the Uinta coal belt of Colorado and Utah.
The work, published in the journal Frontiers in Earth Science, explains that these mines could see a secondary resource stream in the form of metals used in renewable energy and numerous other high-tech applications.
“The model is if you’re already moving rock, could you move a little more rock for resources towards energy transition?,” study co-author Lauren Birgenheier said in a media statement. “In those areas, we’re finding that the rare earth elements are concentrated in fine-grain shale units, the muddy shales that are above and below the coal seams.”
This research was conducted in partnership with the Utah Geological Survey and Colorado Geological Survey as part of the Carbon Ore, Rare Earth and Critical Minerals project, or CORE-CM.
While these metals are crucial for US manufacturing, especially in high-end technologies, they are largely sourced from overseas.
“When we talk about them as ‘critical minerals,’ a lot of the criticality is related to the supply chain and the processing,” Michael Free, who also authored the paper, said. “This project is designed around looking at some alternative unconventional domestic sources for these materials.”
The association between coal and REE deposits has been well documented elsewhere, but little data had been previously gathered or analyzed in Utah and Colorado’s coal fields.
“The goal of this phase-one project was to collect additional data to try and understand whether this was something worth pursuing in the West,” said study co-author Michael Vanden Berg, energy and minerals program manager at the Utah Geological Survey. “Is there rare earth element enrichment in these rocks that could provide some kind of byproduct or value added to the coal mining industry?”
The researchers analyzed 3,500 samples from 10 mines, four mine waste piles, seven stratigraphically complete cores, and even some coal ash piles near power plants.
“The coal itself is not enriched in rare earth elements,” Vanden Berg said. “There’s not going to be a byproduct from mining the coal, but for a company mining the coal seam, could they take a couple of feet off the floor at the same time? Could they take a couple of feet off the ceiling? Could there be potential there? That’s the direction that the data led us.”
The team deployed two different methods to record levels of rare earths, expressed in parts per million, or ppm, in the samples. One was a hand-held device for quick readings in the field, the other used Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, or ICP-MS, in an on-campus lab.
“We’re mostly using this portable X-ray fluorescence device, which is an analysis gun that we hold to the rock for two minutes, and it only gives us five or six of the 17 rare earth elements,” Birgenheier said. If samples showed concentrations higher than 200 ppm, they ran a more complete analysis using the more costly mass spectrometry equipment.
The Department of Energy has set 300 ppm as the minimum concentration for rare earth mining to be potentially economically viable. However, for the study, the researchers deemed concentrations greater than 200 ppm to be considered “REE enriched.”
The analysis found the highest prevalence of such concentrations in coal-adjacent formations of siltstone and shale, while sandstone and the coal itself were mostly devoid of rare earths.
So far, the team has analyzed 11,000 samples. Next steps include determining how much rare earth ore is present, likely to be done with colleagues at the University of Wyoming and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
Comments
Rusty Atwood
I have a few points to make and a much better solution to our desperate need for REE’s and Critical Minerals.
Point 1: Isn’t it counterproductive to be promoting the use of any by-products from coal mines? Isn’t the US and the whole clean energy movement trying to phase out coal production?
Point 2: For over a decade I’ve heard about the potential of coal by-products to produce REE’s and CM’s and in that time all of these projects have been given billions in funding and produced close to zero REE’s and CM’s. This is obvious if you just do the math. If you look at China’s dominance of the REE and CM market, they obtain REE’s and CM’s from hard rock mining around the world not from coal by-products.
Point 3: If you do a brief comparison of the amount of REE’s and CM’s that can be produced from a hard rock mine with a complex ore type to the close to zero REE’s and CM’s that can possibly be obtained as by-products of coal ash you’ll see a vast difference in the production numbers.
Solution: One possible solution to the US’ supply chain problem is to refine complex ore with hydrogen or other high temperature refining processes that can utilize 100% of the ore and leaves next to no environmental impact and zero CO2 footprint. Some countries in Europe are already moving forward with these new types of refining technologies.