Germany Chancellor plans lithium deal with Serbia after Rio ruling
Olaf Scholz plans to visit Serbia this week to secure supplies of lithium that are critical for the nation’s energy transition and auto industry.
Trading mineral resources can be used to fund military groups in conflict areas. (Image by Julien Harneis via Flickr)
The European Union (EU) voted Tuesday in favour of making it more difficult for armed groups to finance their activities through the sale of conflict minerals.
Under the improved draft law, first proposed last year, companies operating close to areas of civil conflict in Africa will find it easier to source tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold through conflict-free sources.
In practical terms, the changes mean that all smelters and refiners based on any of the 28-nation bloc will be asked to certify that their imports are conflict-free on a voluntary basis. But some are said to want to make it compulsory.
“It is vital that this legislation is binding for the key players in the supply chain, such as smelters and refineries, when they are processing minerals,” said Marielle de Sarnez, a French liberal on the European Parliament’s trade committee told Reuters. “We must not forget that the objective of this regulation shall be to permanently break the link between mineral exploitation and armed conflict.”
Beyond Africa
The lawmakers, who voted 22 to 16 with two abstentions to strengthen the draft law, said the scheme was not limited to sub-Saharan Africa. They added it can and should be applied in other places, such as Colombia, where militias control some gold regions.
In the United States, the Dodd-Frank Act already forces U.S stock exchange-listed companies to disclose the use of minerals from an African conflict zone in their supply chains.
Critics to the European Parliament’s initiative say that creating an EU version of that law could lead importers to leave Africa altogether and plunge honest mining communities in those areas deeper into poverty.
2 Comments
rayban
Hopefully this does not worsen the situation that the first law created .
Samarendra Dey
What the critics referring to EU Parliamentarians shows the vulnerability of law to balance the substance called moral, by their assumptions, these critics are contaminating the purity of governance the undercurrent of ideology that generates democratic reliability to a derivative rather than support a deterrent, Poverty is not an institutional anomaly but a mind-set direction a weakness of governing principles be it individual or collective that allows the practice by leaning law by its philosophy, 9/10th possession is law majority wins, so contaminating is the value in suppression to transform into oppression it is in this plankton that criminality survives in the confusion of this ambiguity, even King Solomon failed to show the emotional value of moral justice by such protractor in ancient history.
It is here that we must re-educate our principles to be human that we shall endow and empower the reality of civilizations moral regard as being human and believing in humanity that we shall find comfort and cooperation amongst all nations and religions and unite our being to realize the value of moral and spiritual respect in the making of the galaxies and governing the individual aspects that make collective growth and harmony of governance call respect.