Chile’s environmental watchdog has filed ten new charges against Barrick Gold’s (NYSE, TSE: ABX) shelved $8.5 billion Pascua-Lama gold, silver and copper mine straddling the border with Argentina, also accusing the miner of not properly monitoring the impact on nearby glaciers.
Based on inspections carried out in the last two years, the Superintendence for the Environment (SMA) said, according to local paper Diario Financiero (in Spanish), it was re-opening the case against the Canadian miner. That process ended up in October 2013 with the regulator imposing a $16 million fine over “very serious” violations to the country’s conservational laws, and instructing Barrick to halt the project.
The penalty, the largest-ever imposed in Chile, was revoked a few months later, but only to be re-worked, saying the SMA made a number of “errors and illegalities” when drafting the fine.
Barrick Chile chief executive, Eduardo Flores, said the fresh charges were disheartening, as they further complicate the likelihood of the project resuming construction.
“While in the past we have made mistakes, we took charge and apologized,” he was quoted as saying by El Mostrador (in Spanish).“We’ve been humble and transparent about it (…) We [also] know that restarting the project requires showing that we now have a new and better way to address its challenges.”
What’s next?
After the new amount is determined and the company legally notified, Barrick has the rights to appeal at Chile’s environmental court and, depending on that process, may also file a fresh plea with the Supreme Court.
Construction at Pascua-Lama has been stalled since October 2013 not only because of ongoing legal issues, but also for Barrick’s own reasons. The company mothballed the project after investing $5 billion in it, while facing cost overruns and a falling gold price.
Pascua Lama, which would produce about 800,000 to 850,000 ounces of gold a year in the first full five years of its 25 year life, was scheduled to start production in the second half of 2014.
5 Comments
Nautilus
At least make plans to add Dundee Sustainable Technologies to your operational and defense mechanisms – http://www.dundeetechnologies.com/
terrence simms
Last time i looked, Barrick was paying its Tanzania workers $US52 per/month ($2-day), local qualified engineer $ 400 per/mth. Barrick has a long history of corrupting official’s,stealing local’s mining land, poisoning water ways and shooting protesting locals. Its a shame they have not been humble and transparent about their past history in other country’s as well.
Amisnic
Very bad boys these Barrick folks, polluting poor countries’ lands and waters which they could not get away with in Canada, USA or Australia.
fred
Look, you pay the local wage or cause inflation to a third world countries people and locals cannot survive. Leave Barrick alone, they give more jobs then you who condemn them
fred
they need to mothball all these mouthy greedy people running third world countries.