Chilean ministers unanimously voted Tuesday to revoke the environmental permit of the HidroAysen mega-dam in Patagonia, which would have tamed two of the world’s wildest rivers and built more than 1,600 kilometers of power lines to supply energy to central Chile.
After a three-hour meeting, the country’s ministers of agriculture, energy, mining, economy and health decided to “side with complaints presented by the community” and pull the plug on the hydroelectric project, environment minister Pablo Badenier was quoted as saying by local newspaper La Tercera (in Spanish).
The decision handed a victory to environmentalists who praised it as a landmark moment. The companies behind the project, Spain’s Endesa and Chile’s Colbun have 30 days from the moment they are officially notified of the decision to appeal the ruling, but experts believe it would be a very difficult obstacle to overcome.
“This project has many aspects that were poorly thought out, especially aspects related to local communities,” Energy Minister Maximo Pacheco told reporters after the meeting (in Spanish).
Endesa and Colbun can still tweak the project or take its case to courts, which suggest more legal battling over the fate of the controversial project, which has triggered worldwide protests, may still be ahead.
Chile, the world’s top copper producer, suffers from a chronic energy shortfall that has begun affecting the competitiveness of its mining sector and cramping economic growth.
Experts say Chile needs to triple its current 18,000-megawatt capacity in the next 15 years, but the nation lacks domestic oil or natural gas resources. The dams were planned to generate a total of 2,750 megawatts, almost a third of central Chile’s current needs, within 12 years.
3 Comments
Johnrolce
So how do they plan to get a needed power? By eco friendly coal, gas and oil power plants? Great job environmentalists.
Aussie Dave
Maybe good news for the copper price in the future
Patagonia sin los Tompkins
The Tompkins once again forcing poverty stricken Chileans to continue living in poverty. Meanwhile they continue to live their life of luxury made through their clothing companies on the backs of child slave labor in Asia. Dozing airstrips and building lodges for their planes, yachts, and all their other mod cons. If they are so “Environmentally Conscious” why don’t they do something in their own country, the USA? Go home Doug and Kris, “Patagonia sin los Tompkins!”