CHARTS: The coming critical minerals trade war is BRICS short of a load
"While a large number of countries around the world continue to talk about securing raw material supply, China is actually doing something about it."
Community activists who oppose mining projects in South Africa live in constant fear as they are often harassed, threatened and sometimes killed, a group of human rights advocates says.
In a joint report and video released on Tuesday, the Centre for Environmental Rights, groundWork, Earthjustice, and Human Rights Watch say locals who mobilize to raise concerns about potential environmental and health risks arising from mining and coal-fired power plants have reported intimidation, violence, damage to property, use of excessive force during peaceful protests and arbitrary arrest.
Community activists opposed to mining face violence, intimidation, as well as legal and bureaucratic hurdles while trying to express their rights — report
South Africa has one of the world’s biggest and oldest mining industries. The country is a top producer of platinum, palladium, and it also has significant gold and coal operations.
All those activities tend to trigger divided positions. While mining operations and projects bring jobs and other opportunities to locals, they often also clash with community members because of the impact they have on land use ranging from traditional burial grounds to grazing land.
Municipalities frequently block attempts by communities to protest against projects by using reasons that have no basis in law, the 74-page report entitled “We Know Our Lives Are in Danger” contends. Peaceful demonstrations are repeatedly violently broken up by police, it reads.
The joint report documents threats and attacks in four provinces between 2013 and 2018, acknowledging that their origins were often unknown. Activists, however, believe they were instigated by the police, government officials, private security companies or other groups acting on behalf of mining companies.
Hoping to find their own answers, the authors conducted interviews with more than 100 activists, community leaders, environmental groups, lawyers representing activists, police, and municipal officials. They also wrote to government agencies and several mining companies with a presence in the research areas.
Four out of eleven companies responded, the report shows. The Minerals Council of South Africa, representing 77 mining companies, also replied, noting it was “not aware of any threats or attacks against community rights defenders where [its] members operate.”
Mining companies also have concerns of their own. Canada’s Fraser Institute ranks South Africa as the tenth-worst country in the world in which to own mining interests, out of 91 mining nations.
Most miners report that regulatory uncertainty, the taxation regime, labour relations and employment law, as well as political instability are deterrents to investment in the sector.
Comments
Danny
I worked at many remote mining sites (both in Australia and overseas – but not in South Africa). The reality is everywhere the same: the mining companies pay for everything in the area and the region – schools, roads, hospitals, airports, police, government employees housing etc. Plus taxes and royalties to numerous layers of government and community. Before the mining started, in many of these areas there was a very sparse population – hence no ‘traditional community’ to be disrupted. However, once the mine begins to improve local infrastructure and facilities , as well as well paid jobs appear, poor people pour in from all over the country and population swells. Soon after, protests begin, many times by those new comers or locals who are envious for those working and enjoying better pay and life. It is all about monies, and rights and disruption are always a pretext. Most protesters just want monies paid directly, and not in trust funds or for schools or infrastructure.