Argentine authorities, industry players and unions are expected to sign this week a long awaited federal mining agreement that unifies existing legislation across the country, as part of an ongoing effort to jump-start investment in the sector.
The nation, once a favourite of mining investors, has fallen behind its neighbours Chile and Peru despite containing rich deposits of copper, gold, silver and zinc.
Until now, local regulations were not only tough, but also diverse, with seven of the country’s 23 provinces having a full ban on the use of cyanide over to environmental concerns.
Since taking office in late 2015, President Mauricio Macri has been adopting measures to revive the country’s mining industry. One of the first ones was eliminating a 5% tax on mining and energy companies in February last year.
He also revoked a prohibition on foreign mining companies sending profits made in Argentina out of the country.
Now, his administration is about to pass a nationwide mining law in hopes to pave the way for Macri’s most ambitious goal — to double investment in the sector to $25 billion in eight years.
Under the previous President Cristina Fernandez, who increased the state’s role, Argentina received only $10 billion for the 2007-15 period. During the same years, Chile’s mining investments totalled $80bn and Peru’s $52bn.
The new law, local paper La Opinión Austral reports (in Spanish), is supposed to provide tax stability to investors, help avoid conflicts with local governments and win over the support of local communities for mining, in the same fashion as the previous government did with the oil industry. But analysts at BMI Research warn of imminent risks that could thwart Mecri’s plans:
“Weaker-than-expected Q117 economic data suggests downs ide risks to our forecast for real GDP growth of 3.1% in 20 17 and the possibility of policy backsliding that will undermine growth potential,” they write. “If organic growth does not solidify over the coming months, Macri’s coalition could be weakened in October mid-term elections, which could see economic policies inch toward the more interventionist policies of his predecessors (…) In terms of the mining industry, any shift away from Macri’s business friendly reforms would deter investment and the uncertainty leading up to the mid-term elections will likely delay some final investment decisions .”
BMI’s experts say the other risk will come from the increased scrutiny of miners’ water usage, which is likely to heighten tensions between companies and local communities and leading to additional regulations.
“While we expect the focus on supporting mining industry growth at the federal level to offset provincial issues, local opposition and political pressure could hurt Argentina’s attractiveness as a mining investment destination,” BMI concludes.
3 Comments
Goldfinger
What is no stated here is that during 2005 to 2015, the Kirschner government put blanket restrictions on repatriating profits and the main investor during this time was Pascua Lama. So really there were only 5 projects invested in Argentina during the same time in comparison to probably a hundred between Peru and Chile.
Lets hope there are more projects in Argentina. The country needs it.
Kenneth Viney
This progressive socialistic culture should stay on the path of social reform. Even the rich elite will become poor as will the rest of the middle class and rice and beans poor until they become the Venezuela of Latin America. Lesson in Economics 101.
Most of the rich have never sat down to a meal of pesos. They prefer to be money managers and put their pesos to work so they have more pesos. It is called greed and it is good because it puts people to work and makes things people need and buy. It is called a capitalist system. Perhaps you Latins have forgotten.
Ahasja
Any updates on the law? Did it pass? I could not find any information.