Santacruz Silver Mining reports fatality at Tres Amigos mine in Bolivia
Tres Amigos mine, a part of the Caballo Blanco Group of mines, has resumed operations after it was shut down following the incident.
The Nevada gold-mining industry is keeping its ear carefully tuned to what residents think of the state’s mining tax.
In November Nevada residents will be asked to vote on whether to remove a mining-tax cap from the Nevada constitution, which stipulates that the mining industry will pay no more than 5 percent tax on the net proceeds of minerals. If voters reject the 5 percent provision, the state legislature could impose whatever tax rate it pleases.
Proponents of the ballot measure say the industry has a sweetheart deal that keeps the industry from paying its fair share. Opponents say removing the cap will open the door to increased taxes, which could discourage investment and kill jobs. The latter group feels that now is an especially bad time to be imposing more costs on the industry, when the gold price is in a slump.
Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX, TSX:ABX) and Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM), the two companies that dominate gold-mining in Nevada, have the most to gain or lose from the outcome of the vote, which takes place on Nov. 4.
The resolution was first proposed in 2011 when the gold price was approaching $1,800 ounce. It has since slipped to $1,223/oz, as of Friday. The thinking back then was that increasing the mining tax would help to alleviate a $2-billion shortfall in Nevada’s budget as a result of the recession.
According to the Nevada Mining Association, the net proceeds of minerals tax brought in $159.4 million in 2013, with about 96 percent coming from gold and silver. That same year, Nevada produced 5.4 million ounces of gold, at an average price of $1,200 an ounce, the association states – an amount equivalent to about 75 percent of all the gold produced in the United States.
3 Comments
Alan Morris
In Nevada, mining and casinos are the only businesses that pay a direct tax to the state. There is a sales tax and a few usage taxes but for the most part, no corporate income tax. The main fear for the exploration community is the legislature will switch the current net proceeds tax to a gross proceeds. A proposed 2% gross proceeds tax for all businesses is currently on the ballot as well.
CT Yankee
People are stupid! The best approach might be to point out that once the camel’s nose is under the tent flap, the demise is inevitable! Or drag a few lying “We’re responsible ‘pro-tax’ advocates.” politicos out into the desert and let the sun bleach their bones… Just kiddin… maybe…
Charles Savoie
When tax consumers decide what rates will be—why should there be a cap? Maybe the takers and the politicians will end up having to mine these metals all by themselves. If the cap is lifted, the legislature would raise rates before their next breath. It would be better if Nevada defied you know who and declared gold and silver as lawful competing currencies.