Top pension funds oppose Barrick Gold co-chairman compensation
Seven of Canada’s largest pension funds and one international entity are voicing their concern about the $11.9 million signing bonus Barrick Gold (TSX, NYSE: ABX) handed out to its co-chairman, John Thornton, last year.
In a statement the group said it will vote against members of the gold company’s compensation committee at next week’s annual meeting.
Thornton was appointed as co-chairman in June last year as part of a company reshuffle that also meant the departure of Aaron Regent as president and chief executive officer. Regent was replaced then by Jamie Sokalsky, in hopes of restoring the firm’s stock price.
In total, the executive got a whopping $17 million compensation package simply for accepting the role of co-chairman.
The investor group said that sum is “unprecedented in Canada” for a co-chairman.
“This compensation is inconsistent with the governance principle of pay-for-performance and is therefore disproportionate and sets a troubling precedent in Canadian capital markets,” added the group.
The cluster includes seven top Canadian institutions: Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Alberta Investment Management Corp., British Columbia Investment Management Corp., Caisse de dépôt et placement du Quebec, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, and Public Sector Pension Investment Board. Hermes Equity Ownership Services, which represents assets on behalf of more than 30 major institutional funds worldwide, is also part of the team.
(Image courtesy of Barrick)
More News
First Quantum pulls back from arbitration on Panama copper mine
Signals potential for more negotiations with the nation over the Cobre Panama mine that’s been shuttered for more than a year.
March 31, 2025 | 04:30 pm
Freeport-McMoRan lowers first-quarter gold sales forecast
The company said it expects first-quarter gold sales to be roughly 100,000 ounces below its prior forecast of 225,000 ounces.
March 31, 2025 | 03:41 pm
{{ commodity.name }}
{{ post.title }}
{{ post.excerpt }}
{{ post.date }}
2 Comments
Pension Review
I do think they are trying to fix this problem but it is a shame it has taken so long.
LAMB
In this day and age, to give “signing bonuses” is an invitation to disaster. If all the Board & Management think about is lining their pockets, it is understandable that they are not concentrating on THE COMPANY’s WELL-BEING. Time to earn the BIG BUCKS that they (Management & Board) are being paid. I know what I would do if I ran that company – GET RID OF THE SLACKERS AND REDUCE ALL SALARIES until costs are reduced to a competitive level. Get a new Board of Directors too.