Mining’s old guard needs strong medicine
A new report details subpar investor returns in the mining industry over the last decade, particularly big cap diversified companies which have not adapted to new realities.
Four thousand former miners suffering from lung disease have launched South Africa’s biggest ever class action lawsuit against some of the world’s leading gold producers.
Al Jazeera reports the miners have filed affidavits in the High Court of South Africa against Anglogold Ashanti (NYSE:AU), Goldfields (NYSE:GFI) and Harmony Gold (NYSE:HMY).
The plaintiffs claim they contracted severe occupational lung ailments, such as tuberculosis and silicosis, while working in underground mines, and are demanding millions of US dollars in compensation from the mining companies.
Little research has been conducted into the incidence of lung disease amongst South African miners, and the few studies undertaken by mining companies so far have focused largely upon white workers.
A 2011 article by Jill Murray and Tony Davies from the School of Public Health at the University of Witwatersrand claims that the highest rates of TB in the world are to be found amongst South Africa miners, with around 160,000 sufferers in total.
Despite the high prevalence of tuberculosis and similar lung ailments Richard Spoor, a human rights attorney who has worked extensively with the miners, claims that fewer than 5% of eligible former workers receive compensation.
Spoors says that even those miners fortunate enough to obtain compensation typically only see trivial sums of around $4,100, as currently mandated by South Africa’s Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Act (ODMWA).
This nonetheless remains an improvement compared to practices in just the recent past. As recently as 2011 the ODMWA contained a clause which made mining companies immune to legal action for lung diseases contracted by either former or current employees.
2 Comments
drift123
In the 1960’s when the mexican tomato pickers went on strike the tomato growers developed a tomato with a thicker skin so it could be harvested by machines. What took 250 workers to do could then be done by 25 workers and machines.
I think this is the direction mine owners will go, Machines can be programed to do all sorts of things that people now do. It takes an initial lay out of money, but after that, it pays for itself pretty quickly.
These miners are going to make sure that future generations do not have the well paying jobs of working in mines.
miket
Mechanisation is the only way to go: the purchase price of the machine is a once-off cost, whereas miners’ wages are endless and ongoing and when they attempt to bring legal actions of this nature, the knock-on costs are tremendous. Mine owners aren’t stupid, they fully comprehend the human capital aspect of their operations: they are hammered over safety, dangerous working conditions and any number of other issues. Mechanising immediately removes any safety issues as it removes fallible and vulnerable human beings from exposure to the workplace. Jobs will be lost (that’s a given) but there’s a price to pay for everything, I’m afraid.