AEMA, coalition launch legal challenge to BLM Conservation and Landscape Health Rule
The American Exploration & Mining Association was joined by a coalition in filing a challenge last Friday in the Wyoming district court.
Some US companies aren’t filing paperwork investigating and disclosing potential ties to the illicit mineral trade in central Africa, the Government Accountability Office said in its annual report on the regulations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission obliges US-traded companies to file so-called conflict mineral reports on whether their products may include gold, tin, tantalum or tungsten from the Democratic Republic of Congo or its nine neighboring countries. The rules, which came into effect in 2014, are meant to help sever the link between the illicit mineral trade and violence in Congo. They were originally part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank act.
“Companies may be reporting incomplete information, or not filing at all, because of a perception that they are unlikely to face enforcement action by the SEC if they do not comply with the conflict minerals disclosure requirements,” the GAO said Wednesday, citing industry sources.
Violence has persisted in eastern Congo for nearly three decades. More than 100 armed groups are active in the region, fighting for land, identity and economic opportunity. Some groups support themselves by selling or taxing minerals. Under the US law, there are no sanctions if a company discovers its mineral purchases supported conflict in Congo; it’s simply required to report it.
Key facts from the GAO report:
(By Michael J. Kavanagh)
Comments