The continued rout in commodity prices that has severely hit the mining industry in the past year can’t be considered a “normal” cyclical downturn, but rather, an unprecedented one, says Moody’s in a new report released this week.
The ratings agency, which recently placed 175 energy and mining firms at risk of downgrades, said the current environment is forcing miners to make fundamental shifts in the way they operate.
“Stress on companies in the metals and mining industry could surpass what we saw during the 2008/2009 period,” the analysts note. “As a consequence, a wholesale recalibration of ratings is required.”
The prospects of further rating cuts adds pressure to a resources sector that led global bankruptcies in 2015.
Raw materials have sunk to multi-year lows amid growing concern that slowing growth in China will hurt demand for everything, from energy to metals.
Prices for most base metals peaked in 2012, with a subsequent gradual price decline in 2013 and 2014, which allowed companies to adjust mining plans and exploration expenses. However, Moody’s notes that price declines accelerated sharply in mid- and late- 2015, and that has continued in the first few weeks of 2016:
Moody’s analysts say there is little hope of a prompt recovery. On the contrary, they expect the physical supply/demand imbalance to widen further, leaving the industry in extremely weak conditions and making a return to normality unlikely for several years.
“We expect the US dollar to continue to strengthen as interest rates rise, which will maintain pressure on base metal prices,” they write. “While some miners benefit from lower costs on weaker local currencies and oil prices, this is only delaying the supply adjustments needed to bring the industry back into balance.”
5 Comments
Gary
Poor old China carrying the world economy on it’s back. Is there no one else out there that can assist?
Backseat Driver
Don’t they need air conditioners in India yet?
Reuvensure
This article doesn’t relate to gold and silver. My guess is that they should do OK as they are not really commodities to a very large extent. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Bruce
This article seems to overlook the fact that the Chinese Gov has committed to increase their economy by 25% over the next 4 years by infrastructure builds.
This is exclusive of the construction of a hi speed rail link under the Himalayas and construction of more than 230 new coal fired power stations.
All of these require enormous quantities of resources, far in excess of the previous requirements.
robo
Most of the manufacturing that China loses will end up being done in countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam. Meanwhile, China is transitioning to a consumer driven economy which means they will buy more manufactured products than ever before. Similar thing is happening in India. So I don’t agree with fears that demand for raw materials is dying because China’s manufacturing is slowing down.